You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: 💰Sack the Bank 💰 A Steem Monsters Tale // Steem Monsters Lore!
Yes I know, but losing intentionally to your other account, when it is a competition with prizes on the line is allowed for players in the top 50?
That is surely an abuse of the spirit of the game.
So you mean he should play competitively against himself?
There is no reason for top 50 players to be playing on multiple accounts at the same time. This alone would solve 100% of the match-ups against oneself.
To take it a step further, if this becomes acceptable, you will end up having teams of players at the top, losing intentionally to boost a teammates accounts.
I get the decentralized part, but from a gamer's perspective, maintaining a fair atmosphere is essential to this games future in becoming the best game of all-time!
I guess you should keep following your heart. Our opinions differ, but I guess that's not a particularly new thing.
Things guys say under an anon screenname who multiaccount at the same time?
I'm not multi-accounting. I just don't think you got a valid argument against it.
The roots of garbageposter are easy to trace back to me. It's my alt and has been for quite a while.
What is your valid argument for it?
Shit-comment for votefarming, yet you're criticizing multi-accounting...
People paid for multiple decks. I don't see a reason why they shouldn't be allowed to use them. Do they really have to start using VPNs and pretend it's their friend playing? Really?
Again, I NEVER said there was an issue with having multiple accounts.
But playing multiple accts at the same time to hope for matchups against yourself should be heavily frowned upon by the players, even if SM can not regulate it.
Otherwise, 'teams' will develop to push 'teammates' higher for season standings.
they don't. they are using their friends/twins whatever decks. some do, true. tufkat/taug is a bad example.