Spam Posts Pissing Me Off. Data Please Identify Someone That Can Make It Stop!

in #steemitabuse7 years ago

I like to keep track of my mentions here on Steemit. After all if someone goes to the bother of writing about you or linking to one of your posts, it should be acknowledged.  I have always been an advocate for looking after your followers and people that spread your message.

The first mention is awesome.  There is a feeling of success, a feeling of acknowledgement, of recognition.  In fact the second mention and the third mention and the fourth and fifth and subsequent mentions feel special.  The more mentions and link backs the more motivated I become. 

Until this

  

Multiple accounts producing similar stats reports.  I have a pain in my face looking at these filling up my mentions feed and cluttering tags here on steemit.  To me they are just making good content hard to find.

Now I am not saying this content is not good, the stats are interesting the first time you see them.  Then maybe if you see them again a month or two later, but every few hours, what the heck? and I am a data lover.

So me being me, and being the data loveer I am, I decided to take a deeper look into the activity on these accounts.  Try and find out who is responsible or who knows who is responsible

Initially I started with these account @monitorcap @vertical @trafficmonitor @markboss 

Below are from steemworld.org.  @markboss was set up the ‘official way’ and so was @applbliz.  @markboss then set up @monitorcap and then @monitorcap set up @vertical.  And a new account to the circle is @applbiz set up @trafficmonitor

 

 

 

 

 

The next step was to look into these account using steemsql held and managed by   @arcange 

First I connected to the TxVotes table and I filtered the author to shown only the accounts in question.  This returns a table of all votes given to these account.

  

From the table it is clear to see that @markboss and @trafficmonitor are voting a lot, and looking further into it, voting on their own posts.

But then we have @malekalmsaddi, @eyesonsky, @anomaly and @ubg also voting a lot on these accounts.  So I have added these to the list.

Now looking at the same report, the only account I can find that is voting for each of these 8 account is @ubg

  

The next step was to look at the votes made by @ubg only to see if there are other accounts that could also be tied into this circle

The table below shows the authors that @ubg has voted for over time along with the average voting weight.

  

Both @markboss and @trafficmonitor are showing on this list with an average voting weight of just 1%. So I thought it would be interesting to see if I sorted the list by the voting weight how it would look.  There were 43,532 authors voted for at 1%

  

From the list @appbliz does not appear here, but @appbliz has received 41 votes @1% from @ubg and 293 from @anomaly

 

Conclusion

I did go on further with the analysis and found more links between these accounts and @malekalmsaddi, @eyesonsky, @anomaly.  I have a good feeling these accounts know who owns @monitorcap @vertical @trafficmonitor @markboss

However there are stronger suggestions from the data that @ubg knows all about this, after all @ubg is the oldest of any of these accounts listed..

So this is a shout out to @ubg to have a chat with this bot owner and make it stop, these posts are not adding value and are a real pain in the ass.

If you agree or disagree with my feelings on the posts from these accounts, please do comment below

@fyrstikken has already given @anomaly @markboss and @ubg some downvotes

@steemcleaners has downvoted @malekalmsaddo, @markboss, @moniorcao and @trafficmonitor too.

Do you know any of the accounts in these lists that I did not analyse?  Maybe you could leave a comment below with any insights you would like to share.  I am sure there are more accounts that could be bots out of the 43,523 accounts that voted for a 1%.  I just hope that they are not all bots.

If you have dealt with any of them please do comment below

 I am part of a Steemit Business Intelligence community. We all post under the tag #BIsteemit. If you have an analysis you would like carried out on Steemit data, please do contact me or any of the #bisteemit team and we will do our best to help you...

you can find #bisteemit on discord https://discordapp.com/invite/JN7Yv7j we share a home with @steemitbc


Sort:  

I don't know these accounts, but I did have to mute them personally as they started spamming up my mentions notifications bot.

Going to be checking for connections inside MSP with my own tools to see if we are inadvertently supporting this either.

Yeah, it's annoying. I get a notification and think it's something cool, oh no, it's just the fact that I have a $3 post and somehow that makes me exceptional... Participation trophy bots, I'd call them

Good job, thanks @discordiant

Early checks brought up none of those users as registered with us, and I don't really expect to find anything from a search of our bot use.

Good! to be honest I am just as concerned about the +40k other accounts voted for at 1% by ubg, but there is a lot of work looking into it

Heya @paulag,

I can confirm. I get votes from anomoly and ubg sometimes, all 1%- I'm a real user. I felt like this would be important to note. I'm also getting spammed out by markboss, vertical, and monitorcap.

1% vote going to real accounts

I'll see if I can find something coming up.

-shello

I would like to piggyback onto this reply from @shello too, @paulag. When I noticed the names you mentioned, I can say that I also get some 1% votes from both anomoly and ubg. (I would need to check other posts for the other names because they're not pinging my memory.)

I'm definitely a newbie around here and have been using some of the bots (banjo and minnowsupport) that are a part of the Minnow Support Project trail.

The more time I've been on steemit, the more I realize the application of the bots are creating unique challenges. It's clear that many are here to assist in curation and retention of contributors, but the greed seeping through the pores of it all is disturbing and somewhat gross.

thanks for letting me know

Everyone is getting more focused on not having rewards scammed. Good work!

Yeah, that would be much harder for me to check, as I have to feed the query one at a time for now.

lol someone did tell me that there are over 100K accounts working as bots on steemit

I wouldn't be surprised. In the end, most of my troubles come from the persistent few normal people that want to cheat our free programs using multiple accounts.

It's amazing what people will do for extra shots at our fairly small upvote bot.

There are about 20-30k active users each day creating articles. It seems, that no matter how many people join or new accounts created, the article creation has remained stagnant for the past few months.

Of course, now we have to ponder how many of those active users are creating bot articles.

https://steemit.com/steemit/@penguinpablo/daily-steem-stats-report-friday-november-17-2017

DestroyAllBots.png

I am just as concerned about the +40k other accounts voted for at 1% by ubg

At one point, probably before HF19, there was a chain of bots voting at 1% for every post that got created (with the possible exception of posts that were tagged by cheetah). I don't remember if @ubg was one of the accounts, but it wouldn't surprise me. If so, then that account probably voted for everyone who created a post during the time frame. Here is the link where it was introduced: https://steemit.com/socialist-bot/@fyrstikken/the-anonymous-winfrey-bot-upvotes-for-everyone-download-here-easy-steps-for-n00bs.

oh nice, i was not aware of this, thank you for sharing the link

Interesting homework. Initially, it was just markboss, then, like you, I had notifications from the other ones. Hopefully this post gets seen by the right eyes to solve the issue.

thanks, hope you will resteem for the extra exposure

Way ahead of ya😎

thank you very much, you rock

Great post, I don´t like spammer! Resteemed :-)

times like this makes me think maybe the notifications should have subcategories and you can turn on and off them. i have resorted to mute some. i think i must be the one who have muted the most people. 😎

I need to start muting too

Incidentally, in the stats post I try not to summon the people mention in the post.
Not sure if you know that but this what I do.

< a href="https://steemit.com/@ace108" target="_blank">@ace108< /a>

Note: there is no space after the less than sign. you can do similar with markdown too.

Yes, you are right, I have now removed mentioning via the markdown [@justyy](https://steemit.com/@justyy) so it won't bother others.

Yes, that's the MD version :-)

Great Job! Impressed with the analise that you done.
Perfect!

Are you an aspiring witness, Paula? My voting finger's getting itchy :)

aweeeee thanks @mattclarke, you are not the first to ask this question. Maybe the second half of next year before I could finance it, but it is on the cards

You're exactly what we need here.

Thanks for the insight. Really like reading and learning, through example, about digging through the blockchain and all the tools out there... Definitely some bad actors out there looking to take advantage of the grey areas.

I don't think these accounts or the data they share is a problem: IF THEY DON'T DO IT HOURLY!!

Is there a way to make your mention tracker blacklist them? this would be better compromise.

I think even some hourly posts can be insightful for some people, but I never saw those so I can't be fair to judge.

This is the exact type of analysis I'm looking for to incorporate into my vote-circle identifying bot. The project is on the backburner for the next couple of weeks, but I'll be getting back into it soon enough. I look forward to seeing any more audits you produce on this sort of thing.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 62817.54
ETH 2573.14
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.74