You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Not Safe For What exactly???
In the example 1, there's clearly a man eating a woman, and in the second example, a full nude body. Nothing “shocking”, no genitals shown, so maybe it's not age restricted (the no less than 18/21 stuff), but still somebody could think it's better to mark the post with NSFW. Which doesn't mean just “porno inside”, it's something more broad and fuzzy, though surely porno is NSFW (unless you're a porn actor).
thanks @xinta - I still don't see why any of that is a problem unless it's hardcore and explicitly inappropriate in the work place - whatever that means to anyone reading anything on Steemit, I still don't honestly know - unless this is a fellowship of priests and puritans with narrow perception who need to be warned in case they might stumble upon something scurrilous! God forbid!
This is just Wikipedia, but it fits the use I've noticed, not just here but also elsewhere. There are matters which “divide” people in such a way a community needs to mark them; so that the one you call puritans still can be happy in the community. It's a little effort for you, just add the tag. The strong one should always protect the weak one, and puritans surely are so weak they need to be shielded by what they think can endanger their mind! :-)
Haha - that logic would be demeaning for supposed puritans, in spite of my glib words - and still does n't answer the real question. But your point well taken, thanks ;)
Puritans will forgive me, I hope :-)