Hi @steemship !

It's rather interesting to see a guy who claims to be a former lawyer doing a post about living beyond government control... If you are indeed honest and really care about good honest hard working men and women to not be victims of that corrupt system, I'd be curious to hear what you'd have to say about this, as it does seem reasonable to believe that, as a former lawyer, you'd be able to answer the following question :

Considering that it seems to be TRUE that a person is a legal entity, a tool, that's created by the state, after a man or woman baby started living, without his/her consent, for that man or woman to use and/or exist and/or be abused, in the commercial / legal / public debt slavery world ;

And considering that it still seems to be TRUE that every man or woman has the right to his/her person's surety/security, as recognized by any charter of rights, pretty much everywhere in the world ;

And considering that it still seems to be TRUE that a surety/security has everything to do with the performance of an obligation vs a debt ;
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/surety
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/security

And considering that a signature is proof of surety, and that my signature doesn't appear anywhere on the person's birth certificate ;

I'D LIKE TO KNOW :

Is it TRUE that public debts and/or charges addressed and/or brought up against a person, can be discharged by that person's surety/security ?
YES or NO ?

Also, is it TRUE that the words "This note is legal tender", written on USD notes, mean that these notes are an offer for law, and that any person using those dollars is deemed to have accepted the fact that all government acts, codes and statutes apply ? YES or NO ?

And is that part of what "the consent of the governed" is based on ?

And finally, can you disclose what it is, that an attorney actually attorns ?

Thanks a lot !
I'm pretty confident many will be awaiting your answers to those questions ;)