You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: New Ad Slogan: Steemit... Where The Rich Get Richer!

in #steemit6 years ago

Ha ha, apparently you're so in tune with what's happening on the blockchain, that you can see my reference to you even when you weren't tagged. You're that smart. You should be running Steemit! Heh. I didn't tag you because I didn't want to bother you, but now that I know it summons you anyways, I'll just tag you when I need more brainpower on the job. :D

That explanation helps. And it's totally stupid. What's the point of telling me that I have a $x.xx vote if it's all subjective based on who actually votes?! I understand they're trying to present a certain representation, but it's not accurate.

What is actually happening is I'm using my Vests to assign a weight to a certain post. That weight is paid out based on the percentage of total weight given. More Vests, more weight.

Wouldn't it make more sense to make my vote value what it actually is, and then burn the rest of the unallocated rewards? So if I own 0.001% of the rewards and my vote is worth $0.03 (at 100% power), then if I voted on someone's post, they were guaranteed $0.03. If only 50% of the total vest voted, then the rewards would be given out like normal, but the remaining money that wasn't given out would just be burned and then the value of Steem would be increased. It would be an "across the board" increase in value rather than just a boost that mainly benefits the largest earners/bidbot users.

Regardless, thank you for the explanation. It clears this up a lot for me. It's kinda like overbooking a flight, but rather than kicking people if there are too many, they only give you 92% of a seat. If there are too few people, then you get more, say 150% of a seat, but if you had bought 50 seats, then you're getting a lot more overall.

I'd love to throw a party for everyone! If you can get the vote for me, I'll throw the party. ;)

"Steemit: Where the rich fly in first class and the poor are hurled from the plane at 30,000ft."
-themanwithnoname

Sort:  

That explanation helps. And it's totally stupid.

Welcome to Steem!

What is actually happening is I'm using my Vests to assign a weight to a certain post. That weight is paid out based on the percentage of total weight given. More Vests, more weight.

Almost. You don't move Vests, but your Vests generate rshares (expressed as voting power) and you assign the rshares to the post by voting (where they're expressed by the little number at the bottom). Then at payout the rshares are forcibly converted into Steem and SBD.

I have a longer post coming about this before too long. Tomorrow, maybe.

Wouldn't it make more sense to make my vote value what it actually is, and then burn the rest of the unallocated rewards?

That's... really interesting. You know how sometimes there's a very simple question and you never thought of it because you were thinking of more complicated things? I think you have a point. Not one we're going to be able to change unless we're starting our own Graphene blockchain, probably, but a point nevertheless.

It clears this up a lot for me. It's kinda like overbooking a flight, but rather than kicking people if there are too many, they only give you 92% of a seat. If there are too few people, then you get more, say 150% of a seat, but if you had bought 50 seats, then you're getting a lot more overall.

This is a lovely metaphor.

Quick clarification: I was saying that the situation was stupid, not your explanation. I wasn't intending to disparage you in any way. Thanks for understanding what I meant even though I could have done a better job of articulating my thoughts.

It's too bad that Steemit doesn't have a better avenue for receiving feedback or ideas for things. I don't know that my idea is the holy grail, but I think it beats giving the bid botters a much large piece of the pie.

Oh, well. I'm just going to keep posting and I'll learn what I can as I go, but I've been trying not to get all fought up over things that I can't change. They just make me mad with no way of resolving the conflict. I'll keep an eye out for your next post in this series. Well, I will now because somehow I wasn't following you. I need to get my Steemit license checked because I'm all over the road.

"You win some and lose some, but if you're in these parts, you're probably losing."
-themanwithnoname

I have this problem with follows too. Also there's this thing where some percentage of the time Steemit will show you the "follow" button on someone you're following already and you'll think you weren't and hit it and unfollow them.

One of the joys of Steemit!

"If you can't take joy in your pain, you'll be joyless here"
-themanwithnoname

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.21
TRX 0.13
JST 0.030
BTC 67334.64
ETH 3519.34
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.10