You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: An Automated Bot is Downvoting & Commenting to Improve Curation!
Maybe we should wait and study the results and not judge it before it has even begun...? This is an experiment to improve the whole community´s output, so we may give it a try.
Its a poorly conceived experiment at best. More like we are being used as Guinea Pigs for a few whales. Nobody knows which whales are involved, which ones are not or how long the experiment will last. Now, I don't mind whales deciding to withhold their votes, thats fine, but using bullying and strong-arm tactics to try and force others to join their experiment is wrong. Meanwhile a whole lot of bad will is formed among content creators and steemit users who had no say if they wanted any part of it. I, for one won;t be posting anything of worth until this game ends.
Isn't the timing a bit off as well? Experimenting just before a new reward curve is implemented? Instant biased results after the hardfork.
Anyway, here's a Golden Pineapple for you to give away as a prize for whatever you see fit:
my new undercover operatives
=D
How do you know all that? It´s not even running 24 hrs. yet.
which part of my comment do you disagree with?
???
I disagree with the whole drama. Let´s just wait what happens and then create an opinion about it. It´s not the end of humanity - it´s just an experiment. Rewards are just distributed differently, they are neither denied nor reduced. I cannot find anything confusing about it. Maybe it´s going to improve performace in the middle run, who knows.
Hypothetical situation: I'm not going to vote this week and I demand that you don't vote too. Now, if you vote I will negate all your votes because I am more powerful. I will also get my friends to negate your votes. I just cant agree with that tactic on principle. peace.