No one ever says that upvote on my post was unfair.

Stake based voting :

You can utilize your stake to upvote or downvote (hail) be that as it may you like. The people group would then be able to utilize their votes and banners to attempt to transform it on the off chance that they feel it is out of line. We give lip administration to "not for contradiction", but rather it isn't a law or a control or anything. The fact of the matter is everybody utilizes their stake as they see fit. A few times individuals post about it, or banner or endeavor to give extra votes to adjust, however for the most part we recognize that individuals can utilize their stake how they need. Accordingly - the group can respond. (hail/vote and so forth.)

Have you at any point put out a post that you knew was shoddy or you didn't put much exertion in to the post. All of a sudden it gets an extensive vote and takes off. For a moment you are confounded. "That is the post that will do well?"

I haven't seen a solitary post yet saying... Badwhale upvoted my post unjustifiably.

Somebody gets a banner and everybody needs to play the uncalled for card, and the minnow card and the I worked so hard card. Upvotes and hailing are not reasonable they simply are.

We as a whole buckle down, some of it pays off and some of it doesn't.

Posts are open for 7 days to be upvoted or hailed, it sucks to become involved with a fight that has nothing to do with you, however it has been going on always on SteemIt, it is a piece of the stake based framework. It is a drawback to the stake based decentralized framework. It is the quality of the stake based decentralized framework.