RE: The Curation system needs to incentivise "Genuine Content Mining" - Be honest - Are you Upvoting... or BETTING?
Posts from dan/dantheman will always earn very little curation reward for anyone for the reason I explained in the comments on his post. A large portion of the curation reward will go to him due to his immediate default self-vote and most of the rest will still go to him because of people voting <30 minutes.
These votes are probably a complete waste of your voting power and you would do better simply picking some unknown with good potential and taking a chance on it.
Let's look at the curation reward details for his latest post, which you voted at minute 7 (not terrible timing; a whale voted 4 minutes later):
Your weight is....0.00%
What a lot of people who haven't been around since the beginning don't realize is that most of the issues that are being brought up now were already brought up shortly after the launch and solutions implemented. It's still not perfect of course, but it really isn't bad.
We try not to upvote dan the man posts as we know it will hit by too many people since we noticed as we been here maybe 2 weeks so far. Saving the upvotes for those that brings value to community now or later.