You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Possible solution to content flooding the blockchain with junk. "The 24 hour new article probationary period"
The people who are doing this stuff that you/we don't like will game your rules. And genuine authors will leave the platform be cause they don't meet these rules for months if ever...
The rules could be tweaked. The idea and concept gets us thinking in a new direction.
Do you have any better ideas? As time goes on, we're on a slippery slope here. Getting discussions going is important.
I knew my ideas would get shot down pretty quick. But at least we have people thinking about it and talking about the problem.
I didn't necessarily meant your rules but just any rules. People with bad intentions will always try to game the/a system...
I have to give it to you, I don't know any solution the the situation we're in right now.
I thought about this a little longer; why not just pay a curationreward to downvoters?
Lets say 25% (or whatever %) of the downvote's worth, but maximum the posts worth!
If the post is worth 1.00 and my upvote is worth 5.00 then a max downvote of -5.00 wil lower the post reward to -4.00. My curation wil be 5.00 * 25% = 1.25, but the post was just worth 1.00 so curation is maxed at 1.00!
This idea should still be tweaked to perfection, but lines out te basics!