Well of course I made some oversimplifications as well. I personally do not see the worth of steem so one-dimensional (supply/demand), as it's a utility token and thus long-term connected to the well-being of the applications built on the blockchain, and thus also to user numbers etc. But this is a reply, so I had to build it on the premises made by @dzone to adress his points.

Its Bullshit that "we" (from investors point of view) need "good content".

This is true to an extent. But then, good content also attracts people. If all the content is facebook-like, the cummunities behave like on facebook, then why would anyone go over from facebook? Those who really care enough about censorship and big data to learn a new platform are a minority, I fear.

Thanks for commenting!