The quality of Steemit?

Guidelines are in place to maintain the quality of posts that are building Steemit.
Image source: www.SomeOneElseWhoStoleTheImageFromSomeOneElse.com

What exactly are authors submissions building?

Why is quality of such importance to the point of granting flagging and down voting powers?

I like to think as Steemit evolves its application base will too with twofold timing and focus on providing portals to layers that consist of rich cataloging and relational structures of the data.

Why else the reason for maintaining quality?

The consumers current experience of posts in terms of generalisation is one focused in the now, and maybe some historical depth given with viewing 1 or 2 day old posts on a 'follower' blog page.

We are currently viewing Steemit as Steemit TV with the programmes / posts coming and disappearing.

In order to educate, promote and gain adherence to the wishes of the Steemit creators, justification needs to be shown for the reason of building a vast store of data representing many fascets of peoples personalities. This data that currently only exists as a buried 'Big 'Data' store.