You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Consensus exists only in equalitarian groups, where everybody has the same rights to express their will by influence and be influenced by all the others
There can be formed several clases if you can define overpower so if you have 1 milion you can be happy or try to hit the max ? Maybe 100 milions ? Here we need to define some maximum for voting power not how much steem you can have .
I am not a mathematician, but I do understand a little economics, wouldn't it be cool if we could build a free market experiment. There really hasn't ever been a truly free market and I can't define one off the top of my head. It would be fun to explore the possibilities..
If we uncouple voting power from steem and tie votes to how active one is in the community would that be easily gamed? I remember tying your vote to reputation opens a community up to sybil attacks? Can this be weakness in reputation scores be addressed because I see this as a possibility. However this brings to mind a show I saw called Black Mirror, season 3 called nosedive and how living with digital reputation scores was like living in a prison.
My favorite scene after the heroine ruined her reputation which was tied to ones ability to work and find good housing and ended up in prison and became free.
In the beginning of Americas growth corporations were chartered and corporations had to be located in the state they sold their goods. If the corporation did not serve its community its charter was revoked. I see the huge accounts acting a lot like modern corporations.
https://hbr.org/2010/04/what-the-founding-fathers-real.html