You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Yet Another Post Regarding Unfair Payouts, But This Is A Proposal, Not A Rant
You have made some interesting observations, but I still believe a "few will always hold most" into the future, and will always influence the curation process. This could be countered by "reputation" rather then having it just sit there like a trophy, by finding a way to link rep to your voting weight on a post. I do believe we shall have a more level playing field if rep is somehow included in the equation, and not make it a "money" only space.
True, but then the argument would be - why would anyone power up? Already the interest in negligible. If their SP holding matters less on voting, and thus lower curation rewards (which are tied to Rshares), why would they power up?
I am not suggesting that influence of SP be done away with altogether, it just needs to be "salted" with something like reputation, or something not monetary. This would help in adoption of this platform as a "social" site, which is not happening at the pace an idea like this deserves, even in beta!