You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: 3 different voting strategies: Witnesses, Dolphins and Minnows.
Very informative! Your categorisation is excellent but it does show a skew towards the heavyweights. For the purpose of establishing that this platform does not endorse the concept of the rich getting richer, it is time to relook the logic behind the rewards. I believe as a community we can come out with solutions so that we are not only percieved to be fair, we actually are.
The rewards for curation have actually been re-configured to favor small holders and to prevent bot abuse.
However, some investors have bought a lot of steem or invested in mining hardware and they want to see their investment being returned somehow, that return on invest comes on the form of curation and I think is fair to retribute them.
I do believe who have invested should profit but their influence should be (almost) at par when curating. I have no clue how this can be implemented but it was just a thought. Which ever way I just want fairness and in no way am implying it is not at the moment.