The site shows how much the post is worth, not how much the author gets. The value of the post is split between the author and the voters. It's a fair. If no one voted then the post would be worth nothing. If no one posted, there wouldn't be anything to vote on.
Read the rules before getting all upset.
I'm sorry but i think we don't understand english the same way, that was a very polite way to say things. If i was upset i would just say "i just got scammed by this fucking site".
In my post i'm talking about fairness, it doesn't matter if i'm wrong or not, what matter here is, it was a polite post.
This is the problem with the new-comer here. You don't even read.
It's clearly stated that the post value is divided. 25% goes to curators. 75% goes to you. That 75% is split in half. 50% in Cash and the other half in power. Easy as that.
Is the problem with the new comers or with the system itself that is not well and clearly explained for new comers ? Do you think new comers are going to read 100 PDF pages to know what is this all bout ? Or it should be clearly stated how the repartition works. The problem is not about the new comers, is about how things are explained to them.
That it gives 25% to curators is shown on the website clearly. And you don't have to read that much. There are always some posts about this flowing around + in google you can find it in 10 secounds..
This is not money making site...
Not really 45 dudes disagree with me, actually 45 bots just upvote your post. Look in the new posts, all the same usernames upvote basically every post. So, point is not taken. Post like this would never get that much upvotes without bots, stop dreaming.
The site shows how much the post is worth, not how much the author gets. The value of the post is split between the author and the voters. It's a fair. If no one voted then the post would be worth nothing. If no one posted, there wouldn't be anything to vote on.
Read the rules before getting all upset.
Where i'm upset ? Could you pinpoint me to the part where i seem upset ?
"It doesn't seem fair to be paid less than what the site shows"
up·set
verb
ˌəpˈset/
make (someone) unhappy, disappointed, or worried.
"the accusation upset her"
synonyms: distress, trouble, perturb, dismay, disturb, discompose, unsettle, disconcert, disquiet, worry, bother, agitate, fluster, throw, ruffle, unnerve, shake; More
knock (something) over.
I'm sorry but i think we don't understand english the same way, that was a very polite way to say things. If i was upset i would just say "i just got scammed by this fucking site".
In my post i'm talking about fairness, it doesn't matter if i'm wrong or not, what matter here is, it was a polite post.
The rest is given to the curators. That's not a secret, and not shady at all.
It seems like this is not true. Many people are having the same issue now.
This is the problem with the new-comer here. You don't even read.
It's clearly stated that the post value is divided. 25% goes to curators. 75% goes to you. That 75% is split in half. 50% in Cash and the other half in power. Easy as that.
Is the problem with the new comers or with the system itself that is not well and clearly explained for new comers ? Do you think new comers are going to read 100 PDF pages to know what is this all bout ? Or it should be clearly stated how the repartition works. The problem is not about the new comers, is about how things are explained to them.
That it gives 25% to curators is shown on the website clearly. And you don't have to read that much. There are always some posts about this flowing around + in google you can find it in 10 secounds..
Please could you tell me where is it shown clearly, this would be useful for the next users.
And by the way, 45 dudes disagree with you.
Nice post!