You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit Proposal for Developer and Community Evaluation
Interesting perspective. I cannot imaging a perfect system at first creation. Therefore I must resolve that some tweaks, changes, and improvements must be made to any complex system involving people. If we maneuver carefully, with forethought, we may make good improvements. It is up to us (free choice) to participate, follow, or put forth ideas for making Steemit better.
It is right, but who will listen to the recommendations? The system is specifically built to meet the needs of some very small group of people. Privileges they do not want to give up. In this case, need to create their own and elsewhere.
I have found that the Steem/Steemit developers (like Dan) have been very open to listening to ideas, theories, and feedback. They are in blogs and on the Steemit-chat channels. Of course they wont make every change or respond to every request and comment. But the fact they are there is a huge indicator of genuine interest in their creation. Proof can be seen when @dantheman posted this to the community and asked for feedback:
People Rank - Using Page Rank Algorithm for Better Curation and Rewards https://steemit.com/steem/@dantheman/people-rank-using-page-rank-algorithm-for-better-curation-and-rewards
They could easily just cash-out if they wanted. Some would. They have chosen to stay, listen, and are constantly making upgrades to the webpage and blockchain. I feel like they should get some serious credit.