You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Is Steemit Really Censor Resistant? Is It the Best Place for Ideas to Flow Freely?
I just wanted to relate some info to you as you seem to have a few misconceptions.
- Those aren't henchmen, they're bots. So it was a single entity that downvoted you.
- Downvotes are the mechanism to combat voting abuse. Reputation serves as a filter rather than a measurement of strength.
- 50k votes of any kind would represent the vast majority of membership here. I get what you're saying though, but the numbers are way off.
In your solution number two, you are creating a monopoly of force. When you have that monopoly, you open it up for corruption. In fact, I'm not totally sure I agree with the way we vote on witnesses either, but I'm not sure I have a real solution to it. Anyway, I just wanted to let you know those things.
Hi @moeknows, allow me to respond to your points.
The big point in all of this is, steemit downvoting system is broken. Vigilante/mafia's are what rule what is "right/wrong." And that style has never worked in real society.
It matters, maybe not in this case, but in general because here, it makes no difference whether you were downvoted/upvoted 50 times or once. All that matters is the SP of the person downvoting you. So whether Bernie does it from 50 accounts or a single account makes very little difference. I'm not arguing with you. I'm just explaining that because it is not always apparent.
Not really. Here, downvotes are used to reward monetary funds meaning that it is perfectly acceptable and even encouraged to downvote good works for no other reason than because you feel that the rewards were too much.
In order to fix a problem, you have to understand the problem. Your proposed system only addresses a single aspect of a multi-faceted problem. I just wanted to relay some of the facts.
Yeah, whether they're bots or not, I think, is not the real question. It's the issue if being able to gang up on someone.
It is a single individual. Even if all his power were consolidated into one account, the result owuld be the same for the victim.