The Politics of Social Media and the Necessity of Steemit. This is a chance to grow our user base exponentially. Censorship is not the way of the future.

in #steemit8 years ago (edited)

This pattern is repeating itself at an alarming rate. A platform for social media and exchange of content starts out with principles of free and open exchange of ideas, and then as it grows in popularity and interested parties get involved, the platform censors politically or socially inconvenient parties.

Twitter, Reddit, Facebook and others have all been practicing censorship, and even worse, the censorship is usually subversive. Some censorship is "shadow banning", or reducing the likelihood a specific poster is seen by individuals by reducing its priority in an algorithm.

Whether or not you agree with his politics or the politics of his followers...

The twitter ban of Milo is a great way to show people why Steemit is necessary. Social media has become so powerful that politically interested parties have started to take over and destroy everything social media was founded on. We should use controversial situations,like the ban of Milo, to increase our value proposition to social media consumers. Steemit is a decentralized social media platform of the future, one that is run by a community of individuals who believe in radical individualism and free exchange of ideas.

I've started a change.org petition and I hope you will all sign it.

https://www.change.org/p/milo-yiannopoulos-milo-yiannopoulos-should-join-steemit-a-decentralized-social-media-platform-of-the-future?recruiter=277166336&utm_source=share_for_starters&utm_medium=copyLink

Sort:  

Hell yeah, steemit is the social media platform of the future! Steem to the mooooooon!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.14
JST 0.030
BTC 68154.08
ETH 3274.07
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.66