Not all the large accounts powering down are powering down at the 13 week rate >><< STEEMIT NEWS FLASH >><<
1 / 17/ 2016 - 4:47 PM EST STEEMIT NEWS FLASH : Keep this in mind Not all the large accounts powering down are powering down a the 13 week rate . I looked at 4 large accounts powering down over the last 30 days. Here is what I found .
.
Account # 1 is down 4.62% in steem power over last 30 days
12 / 16 / 2016 = 2,760,610 STEEM POWER
01 / 17 / 2017 = 2,632,891 STEEM POWER
.
Account # 2 is down 4.96% in steem power over last 30 days
12 / 16 / 2016 = 2813798 STEEM POWER
01 / 17 / 2017 = 1745596 STEEM POWER
.
Account # 3 is down 33.22% in steem power over last 30 days
12 / 16 / 2016 = 2813798 STEEM POWER
01 / 17 / 2017 = 1745596 STEEM POWER
.
Account # 4 is down 37.96% in steem power over last 30 days
12 / 16 / 2016 = 2813798 STEEM POWER
01 / 17 / 2017 = 1745596 STEEM POWER
DISCLAIMER : This content is for informational, educational and research purposes only.
Please get the advice of a competent financial advisor before investing your money in any financial instrument.
It is strongly recommend that you consult with a licensed financial professional before using any information provided here at STEEMIT NEWS FLASH . Any market data or news commentary used here is for illustrative and informational purposes only.
This post is being paid with 100% STEEM POWER ! ! ! ! !
I got this 100% POWER UP logo from @stephen.king989
Please voice your opinions in the comments below.
If you find any of this information useful to you. Please upvote and follow. THANK YOU
Be sure to remember any account that was powering down at the old rate of 104 weeks can change at any time to the new 13 week power down rate .
Thanks. It's nice to know that Accounts #1 and #2 are powering down more slowly than they could, but in another way it's nice to know that #3 and #4 are taking full advantage. STEEM's price has been pretty-much stable. If it's stable in the face of large and accelerated power-downs, then there's a lot of resilient demand for the tokens. That's a good sign of a bottom.
This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the second half of Jan 17. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $4.97 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Jan 17 - Part II. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.