RE: Steemit 2.0: What Might The Mighty Dan Larimer Have In Store...?
Daniel Larimer:
"Steem has excellent security on accounts, but very poor governance. The community reward pool is the preverbal wallet on the park bench. Those who are voting for themselves and hiding behind pseudo-anonymous accounts are thieves stealing from the community."
"With proper governance the Steem reward pool would not be pilfered for private gain. Achieving this requires much stronger transparency with identity verification and dispute resolution systems combined with incentive structures that disincentives self-voting."
"I will be moving toward transparent blockchains with strong identity, good governance, and a commitment to protect property rights while disempowering those who would launder profits from digital kidnapping."
It will be not an extension, but new project.
In that case, gotta wonder what Steem price will do when it launches... (could see myself Powering Down for sure)...
"I will be moving toward transparent blockchains with strong identity, good governance, and a commitment to protect property rights while disempowering those who would launder profits from digital kidnapping."
This is, in essence, Steem 2.0.
A new project, based on the same steemit idea, but with a better design that incentivates curating and providing a better governance system.
Hey, that's what I just wrote as what I hoped he would do. It would be difficult, though, to start all over. If there was a way to transfer my steem, and my account, and everything about it, to a place that discouraged self-voting and bought bot votes for the trending page, and allowed a more organic and creative trending page, then I would be remiss if I didn't at least look into it.