You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: DAILY STEEM REPORT SEPTEMBER, 11TH ★ STEEM 1.27$ + 1066 New Accounts
OK, let's crunch the numbers. At the end of April, how many users did we have, and what was the average daily sign-up of new users for that month? At the end of August, how many users did we have, and what was the average sign-up of new users per day for that month? You cannot compare daily new sign-ups to each other, you have to relate them to the total pool of users at that point in time, or you have no way to judge if growth is decelerating or accelerating. So please let's do that now. Please review the numbers you have and present them. Thanks.
The growth of the site has more to do with the level of active users than the number of signups. The signups include people who will discover the site is not a get rich quick scheme and will go looking for the next scheme in short order.
Active users are a much better gauge. I spoke with a member who does actual number crunching and analysis on the site, @paulag and asked if growth was decelerating.
Her answer was that it is not. Active users are remaining at a steady level. So, well the active users are not climbing at the rate of signups, which would be the better result, they are not dropping which would be deceleration.
Does this mean you don't want to crunch the numbers afterall?
the numbers have been crunched by someone who I find has a great expertise... I will trust her analysis. Like I said earlier, you are entitled to your opinion and whatever it may be based on. I am entitled to mine based on a source I trust.
Maths has no opinion. If a recent ratio is smaller than older ones then it demonstrates a relative decline. Now you wanted to crunch the numbers to demonstrate to me that that is not the case. However if somebody "tells" you something that fits into your wishful thinking, then a numerical demonstration is simply "trusted". This is a diversion from radical transparency.
actually, I never said anything about wanting to crunch numbers.
You decided you want to apparently demonstrate your assumed wisdom which would amount to telling me what fits into your wishful thinking.
So, I'd say at this point, I'm not about to believe your wishful thinking and you are not about to believe the person I have seen has demonstrated her ability to crunch the numbers and do analysis... so this conversation has come to its logical end.
For a review of the development of the past 4 months, according to the data, we have average values as follows:
Week 201720: Active Users 50 000 New Accounts 7 000
Week 201736: Active Users 190 000 New Accounts 13 000
201720: 7000/50000 = 0,14 New Accounts per Active User
201736: 13000/190000 = 0,07 New Accounts per Active User
The older value is 2x as high as the exsisting value for week 36. For the period observed growth has decelerated considerably.
Haaaaaaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaa ha haaaaaaaaaaaa haaaaaaaaaa... I just bought a whole lot of STEEM under USD 1,--. What do you say to that?