You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: LOW-LIFE DOWNVOTING MEMBERS
@freezepeach please consider reviewing this case.
It appears to be a gross misunderstanding.
What Marky "thinks" has no basis in reality. If you look back through my posts, I do not think you will find anywhere that I called @buildawhale a ped0. In fact, my only reference to "Pedofile" was in my quote that @themerkymark referred to: i.e.
"Unfortunately because of a few scumbags like the following members, Steemit's days as a viable forum are quickly coming to an end, because it has essentially turned into nothing more than a cesspool of fraud and corruption, controlled by childish members, porn lovers, peadophiles, and other such low-life garbage."
And the offending word has been removed from the post.
They need to work it out between themselves, misunderstanding or not. There has to be a logical solution to this.
You would hope.
I just received 2 more downvotes from @themarkymark and his sidekick @roomservice.
roomservice downvote @starworld/steemit-abusers-even-a-steemit-witness (-1%) 49 minutes ago
themarkymark downvote @starworld/steemit-abusers-even-a-steemit-witness (-1%) 49 minutes ago
Again, I suspect there is a lot more going on here than meets the eye. No normal person would ever act like the @themarkymark is acting. What a messed up individual! I actually feel sorry for people like him, that they can't find something better to do with their pathetic lives. Very sad really!
That is because you made a post that was designed to provoke a negative negative response from him!
If you don't want the flags don't make posts like that, its simple
"That is because you made a post that was designed to provoke a negative negative response from him!"
So let me get this straigh! Steemit allows the posting of virtually anything on its site, including pornography and other such filth. Yet if anyone speaks out against it, they are not only downvoted for that particular post, but the so-called Steemit "witnesses" are allowed to be as vindictive as they choose, go back and downvote all that user's posts and comments regardless of their content, and essentially destroy that member's reputation? It's no wonder that Steemit is quickly coming to an end as it continues to lose members faster than they join.
"If you don't want the flags, don't make posts like that, its simple"
Better still, like most Steemit members (past and present), I will be leaving the Steemit platform as soon as my steem power has been fully powered down.
This twat literally logged onto a place he considered as a Cesspool to remark on what someone they grouped together with "low life scum" voted for, and they have the nerve to say that no normal person would vote like that, as if the reader is oblivious to the insulting tripe that implicates those in "control" of steem as pedophiles and 'other such low life scum'. Fucking retards and hypocrites. What normal person doesn't think : let me check in on this cesspool of pedophiles just one more time and obsess over what others are doing, because I'm not completely retarded.
I think the point here is that if simple name-calling is a "crime" then all name-calling should be downvoted.
And on the other hand, if there "are-no-rules" and "might-makes-right", then JUST SAY THAT and stop pretending downvotes are "justified".
No, the point is that if you despise this place so much that you have to resort to levying baseless inflammatory accusations which amount to Child Rape/Abuse against the entire community and targeting large stakeholders specifically then you might as well simply stop coming to such a despicable place. It has absolutely nothing to do with downvoting, period.
While I tend to agree with you on this particular point, I do think it's important to maintain at least some tacit pretense of Uniform Standards of Evidence (USOE) regarding what constitutes a "violation".
And that's not an issue and can never be as everything is transparent and public. Right now the twat that called steem a Cesspool of Fraud and Corruption controlled by Pedophiles is denying it, as if it's debatable in the least what was said on here.
More specifically they're denying calling morky and or boldawall SPECIFICALLY offensive names.
It wasn't presented as a specific accusation of a specific crime. It was a general insult.
For example, when Jesus threw the money-changers out of the temple, he called them "a den of thieves", generally.
He didn't single any specific person out and charge them with a specific, literal, actual, legal crime.
"It wasn't presented as a specific accusation of a specific crime. It was a general insult."
"He didn't single any specific person out and charge them with a specific, literal, actual, legal crime."
Exactly! But unfortunately our friend @baah has not yet learned the difference.
Let's say for example, as many have claimed, that Walmart is a very corrupt organization which exploits its workers by keeping wages low and limiting their hours, so that they (Walmart) can avoid having to pay any benefits. While that statement itself may or may not have any basis in fact, it does not in any way suggest that a specific employee, manager, director or shareholder of the company is directly or personally responsible for the exploitation of the company's employees, even if such exploitation is true.
As another example, a few years ago as I recall, someone bought some kind of a media device from Walmart for their kid, and upon inspecting it, found it to contain pornographic material. Therefore it would be quite accurate for anyone to state that Walmart was very irresponsible in allowing an obviously returned device to be sold to another customer without first checking it more thoroughly. Such a statement however does not in any way, shape or form suggest that a specific employee, manager, director, or shareholder of Walmart was to blame for this unfortunate incident.
Likewise, making the statement that Steemit is infested with pornography and other such trash is a non-disputable fact. But like the Walmart examples above, that statement does not in any way, shape or form suggest that a specific employee, manager, director, or shareholder of Steemit is to blame for what is going on at Steemit.
Now @baah and @themarkymark may very well disagree with this analysis, but regardless, I think they will find that any lawyer, or any other reasonably educated person, will totally agree with me on this one.
No, they denied even suggesting, not only specifically naming names. Heck they denied even suggesting By Any Stretch of the Imagination.
Downvoted to counter the curation rewards for such a detestable twat.
I'm pretty sure that was a below minimum payout vote.
"This twat literally logged onto a place he considered as a Cesspool"
I think I made it quite clear that I am still here only because I am waiting for my Steem Power to be powered down, so that I can withdraw it, and leave the Steemit platform, just as so many hundreds of thousands have done before me. Try changing the power down period to 4 weeks or less, and see how fast Steemit's few remaining members will leave.
lol yeah, get the fuck out of here, you're only here to slander the entire platform and everyone involved AS you power down. Only if you'd just make like a tree and leave.
Thanks again for your kind words, and for letting other members know how those who are suppose to be setting good examples, actually react to conflict. Words and actions like yours, especially when they come from someone who is suppose to have a higher reputation and set a good example, will do far more to destroy the Steemit Platform than I ever could. Thanks for helping to bring down Steemit!