It is not the opponent's 'job' to refute baseless assertions.

Apparently, it is you who do not understand how debate happens.

I seriously doubt that your 'research' has been endless. This, I understand, appears to be an Appeal to incredulity on my part, but 'endless' implies that you have had forever in the making of your conclusion, you have not, unless you have immortality and have already lived to the end of time. Ceaseless, maybe, but if so, you have done so without actually stumbling over the facts.

Please try harder. The Classical Trivium and Quadrivium can help. Please beware of the authoritarian manipulations of the Trivium such as the Neo-Platonists and the Prussian school.