Sort:  

I've been posting on steem for about 15 months now, and most of those people are ones I've interacted with or known for that time period. The only ones who aren't -- @jerrybanfield and @netuoso -- are people who seem to be doing a great deal of work on the site.

I actually find Jerry's posts a little obnoxious, but nobody works harder, gives back more to the community, or advertises as much as him (pledged to give 80% of his witness profits to advertising), so I think not upvoting him is criminal. We have enough developers/coders that don't talk or interact with the users, we need more people like Jerry as witnesses. It's important to separate if you like a person personally from if you respect him and know voting for him is the right decision.

I came to steemit directly because of jerry and follow him elsewhere. He gets a lot of haterade here and on other platforms. But he just keeps going along - stumbling, picking himself back up, making money, helping the little guy, being relatively transparent, and changing course when needed. He has my full support where I can give it. I only wish I was so productive and try to learn from his example.

I've been here four months and voted for maybe 15 witnesses - idk. I feel like I should do more, but I have no knowledge of this place to decide who to vote for since I can barely format a post. I have other things that take priority than to figure out which rich, big fish deserves my vote for something I do not really understand.

I'm thinking of giving over my votes in proxy to jerry for few months just to get this task off my back. I realize that the average minnow does not even think of witness voting but I want to do "the right thing" within my limits.

Steemit has so many new concepts that I want to take a long nap.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.13
JST 0.027
BTC 58572.58
ETH 2551.35
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.47