You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: An Actuary decides to assign a cryptography/cryptocurrency based project to interns
How should a whale be allowed to flat for false accusations when the primary issues with my statement of a fair game still remain to be disproved. I think you are underestimating the fact that the margin of error is not consistent in correlation to the sample size -
Once again. The result is decided by the blockchain, not by any central instance.
If you prove that sha256 hashes of random data don't allow for generation of results for a "fair" dice game, none are "fair".