You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Curator's Slider - Steemit development
This will definitely nudge the curators towards reading the content.
The reason I don't spend a chunk of my time on curating is: reading takes time and time is money, it's logical to lean toward the task that yields more reward at the end.
I would prefer a vote that takes the majority of the reward if I know the user did actually read my post.
I think the 50/50 should be the maximum otherwise there is too little value perhaps for some users to 'bother' creating content. This way it recognises the symbiotic relationship inherent in the system.
50/50 always sounds fair, however when a user invested a lot in form of SP, we shouldn't mind if they want the bigger piece of the pie than the new user, I'm sure anybody would agree that 10% of a $100 vote is still an awesome vote.
This really depends on the content being voted upon. and they need not give a 100 dollar vote, they may give 10x$10 votes, so 10% of $10 becomes much less attractive.
even 10x $1 sounds better than no vote, we have to accept that the more profit there is for the curators, the more chance a good article would get upvoted, maybe basing the reputation on the quality of the post a person upvotes and have that reputation effect the amount of reward they can get out of their upvotes can motivate them to find good posts instead of selling the upvote