Some dedicated to the personal economic benefit, and others to the real growth of the platform, some groups taking advantage of the fish.

When there are changes of policies in any city or state, absolutely everything is affected, only in the course of time can be known what is the real benefit it brings for all or only for a few, or if it will make the rich richer and wealthier. the poorest poor.

In steemit, the great detail is that its price is generally influenced, like all cryptocurrencies with the Bitcoin price, if it is low, it affects all the other altcoin.

The HF20 I see it as a policy change in a country, where resources are supposed to have a new distribution, the problem is that most of us do not have large resources (RC), so there is not much we can do in around this, much less if we do not have to invest ...

I am not a specialist in economics, but I have had to read a lot to understand what is happening in my country and see if there are other historical moments, something similar to what happens in Venezuela.

Based on that, I set out to look for other relationships, which I will now outline.

Thanks for visiting my blog.

Welcome to my new publication.

Making a Steemit relationship with a country, looking for similarities, apart from what was stated in the opening comment, I see the following:

Source

There are different social classes, seeing as such those groups composed of users of great reputations and voting power (MANA), there are also others whose accounts are of little value, in the process of formation, to call them in some way.

There are communities that function as police species, are dedicated to assess and monitor the proper functioning of the community, recognizing good works, but also punishing plagiarism, for example.

There are those who form closed groups, who only support each other, being very difficult to access them, by requesting certain requirements to be part of them, the same happens with certain clubs in any country in the world.

Source

There are those who offer various services (trail, votes, resteem, among others), depending on the needs of the community, for the same reason is that the different types of bots that have existed up to now have emerged.

There are support communities that are responsible for helping those who are just starting out, or some users independently, who, by their trajectory as a blogger, are dedicated to guiding through their posts, giving options, the same happens in real life, there are institutions and / or foundations that do the same for the most needy, for those who need help of any kind.

Source

There are users who are only responsible for lotteries, contests, draws, and other options in which some users may receive some reward. I do not think that I have to give examples of real life, any person knows that this type of activity is carried out in all countries.

The STEEMIT platform has order in relation to its operation at the level of programming and distribution of resources, determined by its programmers and its creators, if we see ourselves, it is the same thing that happens in the countries in terms of their laws and regulations, they are created by the people who run the country, and that is what determines how resources will be distributed (economic, health, education, etc.).

Recently there was a change in the platform, the Hardfork20, which, like when there are policy changes in any country in the world, there are those who agree and those who do not, those who benefit from the changes and those who do not..

What do you think of what I propose in this post?

Is it logical, absurd, do you find any similarity?

I will gladly read your opinion in the comments.

If you liked this post: Upvote, Comment, Resteem.