It won't slow down or reverse without a superior counter-organization.

Hoping for a falling rock to stop in mid air is delusion.

Eliminate "hope" from your vocabulary, except to describe choices 50-50 type individuals (mixed bag) might make (for example, two of DJT's appointments indicate they might make good decisions -Oneill and DeVos-- on some issues they have purview over --I hope they do, but don't EXPECT them to).

Collective action becomes more determinate, the more people are added, depending on what types of people they are. If more sociopaths join the decision-making, the result is worse. If more individualists/empaths join, the result is sometimes better, if those individualists have a means of making it better.

All the individualists in the world don't prevail when there is no mechanism for them to prevail. Such a mechanism must always be first identified, separately from philosophy.

For example, ten armed collectivists with machine guns can mow down 10,000 individualists who didn't know the event was a machine gun fight, and who failed to impact the conflict when it was still a jury trial.

If those 10,000 people acted early and got a jury to nullify the laws before they escalated, then philosophy has been successfully adapted to strategy.

Without implementation, philosophy is WORTHLESS. So many people agree on philosophy, it's useless to refine philosophy. Libertarian philosophy is a giant warrior, libertarian strategic implementation is a helpless embryo.

Just my .02