You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemitdude No.7 - Steemporn Edition.
"here's a logical argument for you. you are wrong because Ha Ha Ha. oh, i see you already know that argument."
That's false. Your argument isn't wrong because I get a laugh out of it, I laugh because the argument is stupid. We are done. No more tinfoilhattery please.
but i love to bait idiots who use terms like tinfoilhat. which is only further fallacy in the form of ad hominem. calling names is easy. i haven't seen a real argument from you yet.
when i say idiot, it is not because i'm just calling you names, it's because i've done an immense amount of research on how to spot idiots, that is, people with an emotional age of less than two. if you are going to say i'm wrong because my argument is stupid, i do believe that is more ad hominem.
i may be stupid, depending on what standard you use, but i was diagnosed with lymphoma, and prostate cancer, fired my doctor when he prescribed chemo, and i'm alive, and cancer free six years later. i guess i'll take stupid if that is what it gets me.
Maybe that's because instead of making an argument, I was questioning yours?
Correlation is not causation and all that jazz. I'm positive you can find someone to explain you the basics. Maybe it was misdiagnosed? Maybe your body fought the cancer itself. Who knows? But that doesn't mean chemotherapy or other medically prescribed cancer treatments are wrong.
Cancer is a curious thing, scary, but curious thing and like other curious things, it is being studied left and right. Many cancers can already be cured, and it's only a matter of time even more of them will be. But progress is slow, and sometimes the human body does surprise even the doctors and heal itself without help. Most of the time this is not the case though especially if the cancer has already spread.
But this is all I'm willing to say. You may think what you like about me. I won't have ill feelings if you think I'm an idiot. I just don't take "i'm smarter" as an argument. You may. I won't.
Now I am serious. I am not continuing this chat. It is over.
then stop responding.
you're argument was that you were justified in flagging someone because they called HIV/AIDS a hoax. that was the argument you made. the cool thing about the blockchain is, if you type something, and forget, you can go back and read what you typed.
i can admit that i don't know enough about HIV/AIDS to know if it is a hoax or not. i have found doctors on both sides of the argument. i wouldn't flag someone over something i was ignorant about. that's the difference between you and me.
cancer holds absolutely no fear for me anymore.
my doctor sure seemed to think that the degree and license he has qualifies him to judge whether or not he was making a false diagnosis. the method i found for ridding myself of cancer, i'll put up against any other that i've seen so far, unless the sufferer decides it is wise to refer to me as a stupid tinfoilhatter. if your only arguments consist of, maybe and could be, then you might go find a mirror of which to make fun.