You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Perceived Inequity, Churn and a Proposed Solution
A few random thoughts on some possible changes:
- Remove the voting features from the listing pages; This would encourage users to open the post in order to vote on it.
- Change the trending page from payout leading posts to total unique user views; This would show truly what is trending in terms of most unique views. Giving minnows equal weight as whales. And give post being viewed the most more exposure.
- Have an "undiscovered" page listing posts during the past two hours with less than X votes (may start with X=10)
Just some thoughts on how to give more attention to less discovered quality content.
Steem on,
Mike
@etcmike I love these features. The problem I have is even if they are implemented, it does not change how voting periods and reward period are affected. It also would not increase engagement, which is the root of the problem.
I would also add, allow the transferring of STEEM Power from one user to another.
I agree on this point as well, so long as proper controls were in place to prevent sock-puppet accounts for the purpose of abusing this feature. In many ways I think this could level the playing field quickly, allowing rewards from authors to curators and vice versa to create much more diversity in what's trending.