Perspective: customer acquisition and retention on SteemIt

in #steemit8 years ago (edited)

By Jake Brukhman, Co-Founder @ CoinFund.

Like other nascent social networks, SteemIt has the non-trivial burden of competing with network effect giants like Medium, Facebook, and Reddit. The central problem: how do I tear away users who are so entrenched in the established groups and flows of these highly magnetic platforms?

As other players like Ello or ZapChain, each new contestant in the social media game has the dual problem of customer acquisition and customer retention. With enough savvy, acquisition may be relatively easy: users tired of the same old interface are likely to check out a new application and respond to promotions and low-barrier entry. Customer retention is much trickier, however, as the Ello case demonstrates. Networks can easily work up highly exuberant critical mass and then simply fail to retain users, eventually settling into a thankless coasting that even promises of privacy and security are unable to remedy.

I see customer acquisition cost (CAC) in a social network environment as the abstract cost required to convert and retain users. Unlike other nascent networks, SteemIt has the interesting proporty of being able to pay CAC directly to users through a unique economics, and this has lead to very compelling user conversion rates on SteemIt so far. As its platform statistics show, active accounts have approximately doubled since the commencement of regular payouts, and new accounts are being added at a healthy pace. Moreover, the STEEM asset is trading above $0.40, almost a 100% increase since a week ago, accompanied by a 2-3x increase in volume across venues.

All these metrics are great for the Steem platform, but there is a long road ahead. Some areas to watch:

  • Capitalization. The platform has to work toward good capitalization: exchange volume should be continuously improving and long-term investors need to have good reasons to purchase STEEM. As long as the network keeps growing, there is a compelling case for based on expected growth; eventually, a critical mass of users will create good incentives for publishers and advertisers to aggregate STEEM demand as well.

  • Customer Acquisition Costs. SteemIt platform payouts are currently highly inefficient; as a sanity check, note that most introduceyourself pieces are trading "well above par" as early adopters are able to take advantage of a small, inefficient market at the moment. As more users join and the market becomes more efficient, payouts are likely to decrease, thus increasing over all CAC that must be provided for adopters. It is important that SteemIt achieves a critical mass of users before CAC falls below the level needed to outbid the network effects of other platforms.

  • Alternative Applications. A Steem-based Wikipedia, Yelp, or Craigslist are compelling applications that can be attempted on the Steem platform. It would be interesting to ascertain whether early diversification into these applications could constitute a compelling hedge by the Steem team against the risks of playing in the highly competitive social market.

Overall, we love what we see on SteemIt so far! It's beautiful to watch a social network form in real time.

Jake is co-founder at CoinFund, a blockchain technology research firm and proprietary cryptoasset investment vehicle. CoinFund’s team brings together expertise in high technology, quantitative finance, private equity research, and social innovation research to generate insights into this exciting growth space. CoinFund provides consulting and research services to investors and companies interested in blockchain technology. Follow us on Twitter or join the discussion on our open community Slack.

Sort:  

I'd still put CAC at zero or the $2 initial sign-up. Maybe retention or the "value proposition" has a cost to it that is definable to keep people from places with more critical mass. But if new users come to your site organically, and not through ads or sales channels, then your CAC should be considered low or zero.

And to be clear, I am not saying there aren't costs and issues with payouts as they wax and probably wane going forward. But maybe it's worth framing what Steemit is actually competing with.

Is it Facebook?
Is it Medium (you know I think that's the easiest H2H match-up)?
Is it reddit?
Is it Yelp?
Is it Tripadvisor?
is it Craigslist?
Is it Wikipedia?
Is it Wikihow?
Is it Answers.com?
Is it Wordpress?
Is it Tumblr?

...

Is it all of them???? (except Epinions, which didn't last long enough to lose to Steemit)

At the moment it seems to be Medium by content length, Reddit by quality mechanism, to some extent Wordpress/Tumblr by ease of entry.

You're right that traditionally CAC is measured in marketing dollars, and that's not what's happening here. But as a real-life experience of the very real cost of conversion: try converting a tech un-savvy user to Steem and see how that goes. You know, that hypothetical neighbor of yours who is a freelance journalist.

Alternative Applications. A Steem-based Wikipedia, Yelp, or Craigslist are compelling applications that can be attempted on the Steem platform.

The beautiful part is that the Alternative Applications have already started to arrive. The Steemit Market, an exchange where you can buy and sell Steem and Steem Dollars for 0 fees, is open and active.

They have announced they are actively working on a market place, escrow service and messaging service. With all three being combined to facilitate a 0 fee, trustless Amazon or eBay marketplace.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 64303.16
ETH 3137.29
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.97