You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Tagsonomy: a hierarchical retrieval of valuable posts for Whales and its potential for artificial consciousness
I like it, as long as people don't mind being "assigned" anything.
The hierarchy seems like the right idea, but maybe you would like to use the resteem feature already in existence. If you are a dolphin and you see a resteemed post by someone you have followed, you resteem it for people that are following you, which includes the whale above you in the group.
Good idea to use the resteem feature, as long as there is a certain reporting going on between whales, orcas and dolphins that specialise in a category. The assignment need not be a top-down imposed decision, but could rather be a bottom-up process of volunteering for vacancies.
That would improve it, people hate to be told what to do. What might help is if we could comment or tag in our resteems, that way directing things up the funnel. Maybe each level only resteems it ithe their mark if they see some consensus (three or more?) of resteems from below.
I have added soem of your suggestions to the main body of the article. The resteeming if there is consensus (three or more?) of resteems from below, corresponds to what I said about thresholds in the artificial consciousness part. I will also add this. Thanks again and many thanks for resteeming.