RE: LOW-LIFE DOWNVOTING MEMBERS
You're literally vying to suggest that he is a pedo because he didn't refute all the previous slanderous accusations.
What Marky "thinks" has no basis in reality. If you look back through my posts, I do not think you will find anywhere that I called @buildawhale a ped0. In fact, my only reference to "Pedofile" was in my quote that @themerkymark referred to: i.e.
You then go to post the quote where you call those that still remain on Steem all names, including pedo. A cesspool of fraud and corruption....
God you are a fucking moron:
Would you please point out exactly where in the above statement, oranywhere else that I specifically called either @themarkymark or @buildawhale a "Pedofile".
Here is where:
I find it rather interesting that neither of these 2 members appeared to have taken issue with any of the other descriptive words I used, such as "porn lovers", "low-life garbage", "scumbags", "scumballs", "idiots", "morons", "childish", "fraud", "corruption", "cesspool" and so on.
And of course:
Unfortunately because of a few scumbags like the following members, Steemit's days as a viable forum are quickly coming to an end, because it has essentially turned into nothing more than a cesspool of fraud and corruption, controlled by childish members, porn lovers, peadophiles, and other such low-life garbage.
But let's agree to disagree, all those descriptive terms weren't meant for just anyone that remains on steem or control steem. You twat.
"You're literally vying to suggest that he is a pedo because he didn't refute all the previous slanderous accusations."
Nowhere in any of my posts does it suggest that he is a pedo. That is a false assumption that both you and he have made.
"You then go to post the quote where you call those that still remain on Steem all names, including pedo."
Not at all! There are many fine people on Steemit. I was only calling out the childish behaviors of those who are suppose to be setting positive examples for the rest of the Steemit members. Their very poor examples are simply driving people away from Steemit, not attracting people to it, which can clearly be seen by Steemit's rapidly falling membership numbers.
Here is where:"
You are wrong! Nowhere in my statement that you quoted does it show that "I specifically called either @themarkymark or @buildawhale a "Pedofile". Like, @themarkymark, you are making an assumption where there is really no basic in reality for such an assumption.
"And of course:"
Not at all! Read it again, this time more carefully....
My statement was "Unfortunately because of a few scumbags like the following members, Steemit's days as a viable forum are quickly coming to an end, because it has essentially turned into nothing more than a cesspool of fraud and corruption, controlled by childish members, porn lovers, peadophiles, and other such low-life garbage.'"
The above statement DOES NOT by any means call @themarkymark or any other member on my list a "pedo". What it is saying (if you read it correctly), is that by the actions (or lack thereoff by certain members as listed, it is turning Steemit into ".....a cesspool of fraud and corruption, controlled by childish members, porn lovers, peadophiles, and other such low-life garbage."
To be clear, there is a vast difference in calling someone a "pedophile" and simply implying that someone's poor actions may lead to such an outcome within a system. If you can't understand the huge difference there, then I would invite you to copy my quotes and have any English teacher, or even better, a Lawyer, explain them to you. They will all tell you exactly as I have, that there is absolutely no direct accusation within any of my statements, as you or @themarkymark have falsely assumed and implied. None whatsoever!!!