You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Consensus exists only in equalitarian groups, where everybody has the same rights to express their will by influence and be influenced by all the others

in #steemit8 years ago

Yes, but having more money to invest doesn't make you (generic you) better at voting or curating, or better at doing the best for the community.

But you are forced to think in terms of what is best to do. There is financial pain in one's mistakes which creates a feedback mechanism to improve what you do.

I still don't get why Steem allows bots. I don't know if it's technically doable, but I would like no bots at all on Steemit.

CAPTCHAs can be used to prevent bots but they are extremely annoying for humans.

Sort:  

CAPTCHAs can be used to prevent bots but they are extremely annoying for humans.

When I registered on Steemit I was asked for my telephone number, for sms verification (just one time, not annoying).
So I suppose there are other ways to create accounts, without verification. I think that should be fixed.

However, I would prefer to suffer some captcha than having lot of bots messing up the site like now.

But you [whale] are forced to think in terms of what is best to do. There is financial pain in one's mistakes which creates a feedback mechanism to improve what you do.

This is true but I don't think this mechanism is working: Steem is cutting-edge blockchain technology, but price goes down and down (I could be wrong, I'm not trader nor crypto expert).

The big stakeholder of a magazine doesn't directly choose what is going in first page and what is not, it's not his job, even if he could do it with a phone call. That job is done by people paid to guess what is best to sell: its stakeholder interest, but stakeholder is not able to do it. In our case, this job could be done by people in a democratic way, not by whales (stakeholders) or bots (?!#!?).


I will try to write down some problems of this mechanism but it's really just guessing:

Top earnings posts are often nerd/crypto stuff, upvoted by nerd/crypto whales; this is a vicious circle because people who wanna earn money will post stuff based on whales tastes (actually doable because there are few whales), and interests as a Steem stakeholders.
In a popular network (with big human user base) a post about Bitcoin price or fee would never make this much views/likes/money.
Earning several thousand of dollars with a make-up tutorial (zero originality) in a Steem t-shirt is another example, it makes me think unfair.
From outside this money-game looks like a small circle.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.17
JST 0.030
BTC 70185.54
ETH 2512.69
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.56