You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit Users: Stop Giving Away Your Content - People Are Stealing From You!
Instead of telling ME to "go" do something, why don't you list it out here?? FFS! If you can't explain it well, if your people can't explain it well... I have yet to see what anyone gets other than traffic to their post in front of "big" voters, and YOU sharing the funds with your curators. If I missed something, ENLIGHTEN ME but you have to stop blaming ME for writing a post about something THE WAY IT WAS PRESENTED. This isn't the New York Times, it's my Steemit page, my experience with your person. And now you. Both of which leave much to be desired.
I already explained it in my first comment. Your post would get exposure through the OCD account and extra posting rewards which it wouldn't have received had those curators not stumbled upon it and nominated it.
The curators put time in for finding these posts in the masses and get rewarded for it through the compilation posts.
The compilation posts make about 10-12$ per nomination, the original posts make about 10-30$ extra depending on already accumulated rewards and rank in the compilation post.
From what I can tell chief made it also clear a couple times that you would get exposure and posting rewards in the comments. He didn't say you might get extra rewards or that there is a chance. He knows all accepted nominations get extra posting rewards.
Yet you still don't seem to get that that is part of it.
I asked him to explain what he meant by rewards. As a noob, who you guys are "trying to help" - I didn't know what that meant. I'm still not sure I do. I've only been here since June. From what you can tell: did he answer it at all? From his response, did he explain that to me in any way? Have you? Maybe that's why I "still don't seem to get that that is part of it". Ugh.
Ugh, indeed.