You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: 'Interesting' content > Trending?
I don't think there's any way to achieve that without using human curation.
Yes I think that is the case - but stake weighted votes may not be helping 'highest quality' make it to the top. And so I can faff around with stuff like this :)
I've not got round to a second reply to you on your post yet, and do plan more on the subject myself.
It's a bit of a needle into some of your Posts' argument I think, but there's no point throwing shit over the wall - I'm looking forward to your next piece on helping to iron out this one.
Cheers!
Funnily enough @tcpolymath sent me a link to your post here just a few minutes ago. If you read @ned’s second comment he basically says this is just one thing hey are considering. No definite plans.
I wrote a post a couple hours ago about some factors that I think would go into a quality author score. Hypothetically a quality author creates interesting content.
I think with some experimentation we can get a pretty good fit on author quality with data scrapes from the blockchain. It would take some hefty processing though to do an analysis compared to other authors on the fly as opposed to some fixed standard.