You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Observations: Why drawing a steemit logo isn't proof of authenticity.
Are you going to investigate this or do you want me to explain it for you?
Yes, please explain, I am really not sure what you are trying to point out with the data structure in the screenshot.
you investigated anyone you could find associated with us while claiming not to take sides
could you please also elaborate whom you are referring to as "us"? I am not quite sure which "sides" you are trying to associate me with.
Is this still relating to the @transisto & @newsflash thing?
Also, I'd appreciate if you didn't spam this screenshot, I think it is quite visible that I take time to see and respond to all commenters, so there really wasn't any necessity to post this 10 times over.
P.S.: Thanks for the downvote. Great way to communicate with me!
Did you ever find out what this screenshot was supposed to mean. I am curious and sad now.
see @jphenderson's reply to this thread
Thanks
Well, I've also finally been able to speak with him on discord. But I am not much smarter from it. I've received the encouragement to fuck myself multiple times and for some reason he thinks I investigate people close to him?!
In essence it still seems to be about this comment tread under one of my early posts.
Apparently the screenshot is supposed to show how a comment, in which ownership of an account was denied, has been deleted?! But since we are looking at the column structure for a DB mirror of steemit accounts... oh well.
You clearly chose a side by investigating anyone close to us at all and not investigating them at all. You're sherlockholmes, you figure out why this is fucked up. Hint: look at the left side qualifications and how the right side doesn't comply. If you're really interested this is the database entry where transisto denied knowing newsflash that magically disappeared. But I'm sure you already knew that. You've already exposed your "side" and it's clearly not the truth.
Your screenshot shows an SQL DB, so I still do not know what you are looking at there, it certainly isn't real blockchain data.
If you are implying that someone deleted something from some database, you should be more specific.
Deleting evidence on the blockchain should by no means be possible!
Also, that "owner" thing you are highlighting contains child elements, you are highlighting the parent level and it's properties, not the content. Even if someone deleted the contents here, the owner signature of the account would be gone, making the account invalid. so yeah?!? What is this even supposed to be about?
What "side" is that you put me on?!