@smackdown.kitty Misses The Forest For The TreessteemCreated with Sketch.

in #steemit-abuse7 years ago (edited)
Sort:  

Interesting view. I guess the bot needs to be watched and adjusted step by step to find the right approach - if that is even possible.

I think a better approach would be using the data that is being accumulated taking in consideration the users number of self-votes, up-votes, comments, and posts publish some detailed analysis on those clearly not acting in the best interest of the community that can be manually flagged.

For example, lets say these are running stats for the past 7 days of two users that both have 5000 SP:
@user1

posts: 5
self-upvoted posts: 5
comments: 50
self-upvoted comments: 2
upvoted posts: 65
upvoted comments: 30

@user2

posts: 56
self-upvoted posts: 56
comments: 14
self-upvoted comments: 14
upvoted posts: 0
upvoted comments: 0

Who is a drain on the reward pool? Who could be accused of block chain bloat?

Because @smackdown.kitty is flagging everyone their effectivness is diminished when flagging @user2 who is just here for the money. They'll leave when they find it is no longer profitable to be here.

The flag may have a negative affect on @user1's experience here in the community. Especially if they are a new user that bought their STEEM or an older user who spent months earning it.

Very good thoughts. User1 could indeed suffer from Smackdown.Kitty but it would be undeserved. This bot must be adjusted or it creates more harm than good.

Very interesting I never view the system of steemit this way and ca be manipulated base on no. Steem

The amount of STEEM you hold affects the value of your vote. Voting is a finite resource though. If you have a 1000 SP you cannot up-vote every post or comment at top dollar. With every vote you make you deplete your Voting Power and it regenerates at about 20% per day I believe.

@patrice
Good content
Keep sharing good posts!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63098.94
ETH 2621.87
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.74