You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Case 12: @rtdcs is growing a gang of sock-puppets

in #steemit-abuse7 years ago (edited)

Agree on the spam issue. Having bandwidth limitations was one of the great features to help mitigate spamming. It made quality interaction actually somewhat necessary to get started - and that was one of the draws for this platform (which has been all but lost at this point).

I never understood why catering to low-quality users was preferred over the alternative.

One of the reasons bandwidth became an issue for new users was due to the payout period being changed to 7 days. When you have to wait that long to see your first rewards trickle in, it makes overcoming bandwidth limitations much harder for people eager to interact. It's another one of these changes that were made without properly evaluating the potential consequences and understanding the coherence of the original protocols and vision.

But they just kept plowing ahead without worrying about the effects of the changes...even after-the-fact, when abuses became much more rampant and lucrative. At this point, I have no expectation that anyone actually cares to restore protocols that were both purposeful and effective.

Sort:  

If I'm not mistaken Dan warned everyone against the changes in HF19 for the linear rewards issue too. Giving bigger (relatively) vote power to us smaller account too. All of it together kinda help breed this incentive to scam the platform.

I am staying positive that over time the issue will be corrected, learning as they go along, Steemit still is "beta" after all.

I wish I could disagree!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.15
JST 0.028
BTC 57850.91
ETH 2358.42
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.43