You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Is this what you stand for?

in #steemisdeadlonglivehive4 years ago (edited)

As @cmp2020 already said, I understand what you mean.

All I can say is

First they came for the largest account, Justin Sun, and you did not speak out - because you were not the largest account

Then they came for the neutral STEEM users (who even voted for hive witnesses), and you did not speak out - because you were not one of them

Then it is your turn - and there are not that many left to speak for you.

  • update: it seems that some people don't understand satire and that in the first two lines they = hive attackers.
Sort:  

For the past 7 years, it has been public information that voting for multiple copies of a single actor as witness is an attack on DPoS. The definition has existed for a long time. Whether people previously attacked the chain from ignorance or defiance is unknown, but the fact remains that attacking stake was removed - not neutral stake as you claim. To justify steem HF23, new definitions of "attack" have been created, and very little of the crypto world will believe in these new definitions

I agree with you that freezing Justin's stake was wrong, but that in no way justifies the action of steem HF23

You realize that by saying this, the current steem witnesses are the German Nazi party in the scenario??

two wrongs don't make a right. Wrong plus wrong, just shows how weak this deployment of DPOS is.

10 dongs don't make a right either

omg, so much dongs

You are one of the biggest hypocrites of all and you just crave power. You ranted and raved about this exact same thing and now you will support it because Justin Sun gives you easy money.

You aren't playing with a full deck of cards honey.

You should submit a proposal to rename the chain to “tit-for-tat”.

No matter how you try spinning the butthurt, you guys come absolutely bad looking out of this. Just a bunch of vindictive, wannabe authoritarian rulers who want revenge for all perceived done hurt. I expected more... better.

친절한 안부 😊
I wanted to reach you many times before, but never did because the conflicting scenario has overwhelmed my willingness to rise my voice. But this time I want to address some issues I really am concerned about. I deeply respect Asian culture, it's a real petty that events had turned the way they did... So far I just watched the events from a fence, I even was inactive for a while because of the overall behavior here was against my principles.

But this last fork is quite troublesome for me, it deeply harms my perception of some Asian folks that seemed to be beyond the childish attitude both some Hive and Steem supporters had.

In that regard, you seem to be one of the most genuine and honest users from the Steem supporters group. So I want to rise some issues about this new step towards the path of mistrust, dishonest behaviour and complete lack of ethics from both sides. The disrespectful tone of the comments from users supporting Hive and the decisions taken by current Steem witness is proof of that. Please read this comment wrote from another user here and let me know your thoughts about this issue, I still am failing to see why you are supportive of the new hard fork

Yes. Anyone is free to create a new fork with whatever code and data they want.

But there is one key difference here, namely whether or not the owners of the accounts whose states have been altered will themselves have to go through the trouble of first getting the support to run a version with their tokens, and second to have that token listed on exchanges and to thus gain value.

While I was strongly against the Hive exclusions, at least those excluded did not have to do anything to keep their existing STEEM balances. Those who forked to Hive created a new token, and did all the work to get it listed on exchanges and recognized in order to hold value. On the other hand, if those affected by the alterations of balances included in this fork want to run a version with their funds, then granted that this code gets accepted by exchanges, they will have to come up with a different token with a different name and do all the work to give it value.

Thus it is not apples and apples. In one instance, the affected party is imposed with a significant cost in order to retain the value they once had. Wheras in the other instance, those excluded from the HIVE fork has kept everything they had beforehand.

Again, I disagreed with the exclusions, as well as the spam and other attempts to make Steem unstable. But still, this logic does not apply equally.

When you use a quote about the Nazis and put yourself in the Nazi's group XD

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.12
JST 0.027
BTC 61861.45
ETH 2995.16
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.48