You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemfield Round 12 Results
Yeah, it's true, but I think I had to specify it first because placed LAND can't be directly burnt by the land placement rule.
I think you're right, it would need some tweaks to make it winnable, if things are getting burnt. The cap functions okay but not the allowable # of land to be distributed by the token. We probably will need some rules that facilitate LAND capture (ownership transfer to opponents under certain criteria).
There are other methods, but yes.
The rate at which the burning would occur under your rules is pretty hefty. Which is hilarious, really, but might be just a little too spicy.
There are infinite other possibilities, including creating entirely new win conditions which could be fun to drop in alongside. Because I am a sick little monkey that way.
With just the two of us it may deadlock. Unless one of us brings friends lol. Or is otherwise very very clever, like you say.
At least within the current proposal architecture, a deadlock is extremely unlikely. Even if your proposal is accepted. And that's cool.
It'll be interesting to see what people want to vote for at this point. Or if anyone else has a solid counterproposal.
(Man, if only we could vote on all of the proposals and have people decide which one they like most of the group. But who would have introduced a rule like that?)