Uh... Steemit? You have a problem!
Source
Warning: The following content may be a little alarmist in nature and is intended to convey a sense of urgency rather than a call to panic.
...
This has been brewing upon my mind for over two months now - and I feel it necessary to bring it to you for your consideration and feedback.
When I say that Steemit has a problem - in truth I see it as Steemit having a complex of intricately related problems - and I shall be delving into them here and now.
Content Leeching
The posting of other peoples' works as if they were one's own.Certain users seem content to just post somebody else's video along with their extensive official-looking footer that takes more space on-page than the video itself. Add a catchy title - and away it goes to make money.
Now I know that services like @steemcleaners, @cheetah and others make real efforts to detect instances of text-based plagiarism. That is cool. At least wanton text plagiarists need to put in a little effort beyond copy-paste.
Source
However this as a whole is dragging down the legitimacy of the Steemit platform.
Furthermore there is the whole specter of copyright infringement litigation to consider. Just because it hasn't yet reared its head doesn't mean that it won't - and something tells me that the kinds of entities that took out Napster, etc. are not going to settle for "Its on the blockchain and blockchain is forever" as an answer.
If they don't make Steemit unmake the 'forever' part then they will make Steemit organize a 'forever' compensation. Implications for dtube?
Content Acidity
By acidity I do not refer to explicit materials.Rather I talk about the posting of materials that are defamatory.
All the worse if completely untrue.
Source
I also refer to language that is just personally offensive.
Blockchain is blockchain. What is said cannot be unsaid - no matter how wrong.
So far.
If Steemit were ever to whole-scale attract the sorts of people who think nothing of the responsibilities that go with exercising their "right to free speech" then such would drag down public perception of the platform. Such would put some people off of getting on here.
The same sort of applies to bullying also - and instances of such have been rearing its head here and there - and accounts have been ruined as a result (all the more insidious when the basis for such bullying is something that the target 'is' (or believes) rather than 'does').
Unsurprisingly an abundance of toxic behavior leads to a toxic environment. It should also be unsurprising to hear that such shall have ramifications upon the future of Steemit if left unchecked.
Content Overlap
Think... politics - or Trump.
Source
The image is more representative of the 'middle-layer' of politics.
For every single thing that Trump (or Obama - 'shrugs') does, you can bet that there will be 'several' Steemit posts dedicated to reading into it. Whether its an aggressive handshake, or a confident brushing of shoulders, or the use of tough language with Kim, or even a round of golf - the thoughts of users on the reporting of the matter upon some medium is going to make it onto Steemit.
It one looks at the sum of these posts then one would optimistically hope for a 50:50 split between the stuff that they have in common (the news), and the stuff that they don't (a portion of the opinion).
It doesn't need to be politicians or celebrities or news either. How many times are we going to hear about the benefits and dangers of vaccines?
Herein I've hinted at another problem...
Information Burial
Whether its through the simple passing of time, or through the flooding of other 'me-too' posts, any good article is going to find itself receding slowly and surely into the mists of the night.Sure... its on the blockchain forever...
...but how many are going to specifically look for a particular post with arguably the best content, within a sea of 'kinda-good-enoughs'?
Source
In fact - I bet that this post is itself overlapping upon the content of others who have sought to bring issues with Steemit to light.
Perhaps there are lessons to be learnt here - and I'd suggest that Wikipedia's curation system would make for a pretty good start. Yes - I know that the data structure is different - and that Wikipedia's model is far from optimal itself - but one thing that Wikipedia does have going for it - is a topic-centric model.
Content Relevance
How well is steemit content inter-linked? Truly...There is a lot of content to be true... and if I use a specific keyword then I will likely come across some content.
The problem is that if something is not in the title or the tags then it will not show up.
Source
More-so - how well is it structured? I bet that there is enough information about various topics to bring about either a time-line or a basics-to-mastery list - but such sorting/curation is not part of the present paradigm.
So the result is akin to a large kid's toy box with a bunch of partitions for different 'kinds' of toys (dolls, blocks, action figures, etc.). Yes the blockchain can be analyzed - but is it designed for the use of us mere mortals or is it intended for the benefit of Elon Musk's next AI?
Utility-Accessibility
There exist utilities out there that can help me to access the blockchain more effectively.However I'd hardly say that they are at my fingertips. I need to look for them (or have them recommended to me) - and they sometime have their own websites and may even need my public posting key.
Its not intuitive. Its not very accessible. These are problems.
Source
Payment-Centric Model
"Come for the money - remain for the community"This is a mantra popularly attributed to Steemit.
However payment-centric behaviors like:
- Self-up-voting (because vouching for the self is curation...)
- Quantity-based posting strategy
- Follow for follow requests
- Begging for Up-votes ("Nice post! Pls. up-vote me.")
- Demanding Up-votes (Otherwise labeling comments as "spam" (balderdash))
- Chasing the contests
- Following/ up-voting/ sucking up to high-rep/ SP users (scavenger behavior)
And the list likely goes on... These do not really benefit the Steemit community.
Source
While payments make up for a fair amount of the appeal of the platform, the truth is that the 'value' of such is about as "in our heads" as is the case with fiat money.
It is the information that goes onto the blockchain where the real value lies. The better the quality of the information and its infrastructure, the higher the value of Steemit.
Which is like saying that the value of the ocean is the great biodiversity of its occupants - and the quality of the water. If the water should be polluted then the overall quality and value of the ocean would fall.
As such it is evident to me that one thing that Steemit will need to do at some point in future - is to shift away from a payment-centric model to an information-centric model.
Which is not to say that payments should not remain an incentive in any such new model - but the basis for such should be smarter.
Perhaps its time to weave Steemit data flowers... Conclusion.
If Steemit does not - then somebody else will... and Steemit may go the same way as Nokia, Nintendo, and Myspace - as others learn from Steemit's inadequacies and enter the market with a better overall paradigm - leaving Steemit to either scramble to do what it should have done a long time ago to "catch up"- or to rely upon its head-start to carry it through only to find that, like the polar bear, its comfort zone (and pre-existing user-base) is ever more rapidly chipped away at by circumstances both within and beyond their control.
Source
Does anybody really want to see Steemit go that far South? I don't.
As such I motion for the development of a new paradigm. One worth shifting to.
If you found this post interesting and would like to share this with your friends then a resteem couldn't hurt and would be appreciated.
If you have some feedback for me then feel free to share your views in comments.
Even better - lets start a discussion on this subject. A civil conversation can go a long way.
Sincerely,
Previous Post: Meme Challenge 33 - Entry 1 - Always Look on the Bright Side of Life
Wow. Very well said. You hit every issue on steemit right on the nail. I really do hope that some of these problems get fixed sooner than later as the community grows. This platform has so much potential and I really hope that we get this issues sorted out soon. Thanks for sharing pathforger :)
You are very welcome @mrslauren - and thank you for your kind words. :c)
Yes - I like to think that I'm highlighting the areas that could use improvement. I see Steemit as a friend - and there comes a point in any true friendship that one will say what the friend does not want to hear but needs to be said. :c)
May the message ring loud and true and reach the ears that it truly needs to reach. ^_^
Thanks again - also for the up-vote. :c)
They can easily be fixed already... it's called a flag on the top right corner of every post.
The copyright infringement going on is the main thing that worries me. That could destroy Steemit. What's even more concerning is that Steemit Inc doesn't seem to be concerned, or they don't know that it's happening to the extent that it is. I dont think it's an unsurmountable problem, but even small problems become big when you ignore them.
Thank you @harshallele, both for your up-vote as well as your pertinent comment. :c)
Yes - I refer to Napster for a reason. People thought that Napster was too popular for the music industry to destroy - and all that remains of its legacy are a few odd references like this one - and other copy-cats that invariably get shut down.
I too think that the issue is surmountable - and may require an intermediate layer before data is committed to blockchain. In this way data can be screened for copyright-infringing materials pre-commitment - and thus retaining the integrity of the blockchain.
Of course - as with many things - its not that simple - and I am sure that the Steemit devs have at least spared thought to the matter.
Thank you again. :c)
The devs just don't seem to be interested in keeping the community up-to-date with what they are doing. Regular communication can keep the community confident that there is someone that is steering this ship. Otherwise people just start questioning if the people at the top are committed to the goal.
Ah...
Well the next best thing would be to direct our questions towards the witnesses of Steemit then. I would imagine that the Witnesses have a little more communication going on with the developers.
In truth I don't think that regular communication is necessary during fair-weather days. Being a little 'hands-off' can make for a more leisurely, organic experience.
However things change when one is heading into treacherous waters with rocky outcrops and an unsettling mist as day transitions to night, lightning forking down from clouds looming upon the horizon...
OK I may have overdid that description... but you get my meaning. /;cP
One way to draw their attention is to spread this post wide enough through resteems. Of course - approaching them directly about it may suffice.
Thanks again @harshallele. ^_^
"Footer that takes more space than the actual video" - this hahaha. But you're right, there are those just wanting a quick buck or two and don't care for the community. I think once some more issues get resolved, it will be a lot better for Steemit in general and I look forward to seeing it grow well.
Heh... yes that is a bit of a personal peeve - but a footer that dwarfs a video does heavier imply that the video is the creation of the poster (even though often cleverly subtle - by including a different name in it for example). ^_~
Yes, lets definitely hope that this post serves as a ping from which the devs can plot their course.
Thank you, @thegoliath, for your comment :c)
Upvoted and RESTEEMED :)
Thank you kindly, @ipkiss, both for your upvote and resteem. :c)
Appreciated. ^_^
Well there is a lot of issues with all this things on Steemit. I guess you have spotted most things that I also have noticed. And I think it is important to make this visible to be able to act against it! There is so many great things on Steemit and there is a need to make the great things grow and the bad things and issues shrink. That is why this kind of post is needed, well said!
Thank you kindly, both for the up-vote and the encouraging comment @kerlund74. :c)
Very much in-line with what you're saying, I too see the great potential of Steemit - and I'm half-way a layperson (sometimes it takes an outsider to make observations that might otherwise be missed). ^_^ That being said we both see that there are imperfections - and a couple of them may have unfortunate yet forseen repercussions.
Thus, my main intention with a post such as this is to provide a constructive criticism that leaves a fertile landscape from which improvements can spurn.
I trust that this post, and all the great feedback in comments, will reach the ears of developers, one way or another- and we'll have done our small part. :c)
Thank you again @kerlund74. :c)
Great post @pathforger! I haven't been on Steemit very long and have noticed all of those things, as well as a ton of super weak content.
This was not one of those. Great read.
Thank you kindly for the up-vote and the supportive comment @theroadtoriches. :c)
Yes - I try to be one of those 'quality-oriented' users on Steemit - and while it can be time-consuming, if I get some people to say "Hmmm" - then I'm ahead of the game. ^_^
Thanks again!
as far as content is concerned most people on the planet have crap to share because there lives are boring and they have nothing interesting what so ever to talk about but they all want to make money so get used it. the handful of people who produce content of any value what so ever will always be drowned out by the global sea of mediocrity. you live in a mediocre world run by mediocre people intent on keeping it that way.
Thank you for the interesting perspective @aaronmda. :c)
If you think about it that actually makes sense. A lot of people out there aren't on a mission or have a mission to spread. Neither are they passionate about spreading knowledge about this or that. And a good portion of people who do, don't have 'enough' of it to sustain an on-going cycle.
And you know what?
Thats OK.
What is less OK is that, infrastructurally speaking, Steemit may be considered akin to a desert-scape with rolling dunes and rocks here and there - and the sparse signs of what used to be a road peaks through at several points - and sign posting that either never was or which has been eroded to be but blank planks of wood embedded in the drift.
In other words - the path is far from clear. Common sense does give some people a clue - but they look at the trending section (because, lets face it, Steemit automatically puts you on the 'trending' page and you get to see how many hundreds or even a few thousands this little post (which needn't be particularly representative of quality) by so-and-so-who-is-well-established-for-any-of-a-variety-of-reasons has garnered - and they join thinking...
"Wow! I wanna be 'that guy/gal'!"
Then they figure that a few good posts will be bound to get them noticed - and...
...nothing...
Their masterpiece (yeah - I know that many don't start out with such) goes largely un-noticed - and gains a grand total of $0.02, if lucky, because they didn't know to use the introduceyourself tag.
Tha produces mediocrity. People who have been given up on throughout various phases of their lives- just living-down-to-expectations... and its a shame... because they 'are' capable of better.
Thank you again for the comment. :c)
Congratulations @pathforger! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP