STEEMCLEANERS MAKING STUPID MONEY CENSORING EVERYONE

in #steemcleaners7 years ago (edited)

0.99sbd every comment steemcleaners is making because they are upvoting their own comments..

they are commenting every 3 minutes at 99C REWARD FOR UPVOTING THEIR OWN POSTS..

the spam HATER IS SPAMMING TOO

vbnvbnvbnv.jpg

HOW IS THIS FAIR WHEN.. THEY ARE TARGETING PEOPLE WITH AFFILIATE LINKS..

THEY HAVE THEIR OWN SCAMMY SCAM FOR MAKING QUICK MONEY!!!!!!

I ASSUME THEY HAVE BEEN COMMENTING LIKE THIS SINCE THE LAUNCH, THEY MADE STUPID CARTOONS TO MAKE THEMSELFS LOOK BETTER THAN US BUT IMO THEY ARE TAKING ADVANTAGE MORE THAN ME!

PLEASE SHARE THIS IF YOU FEEL THIS IS WRONG

Sort:  

Steemcleaners is one of what is keeping the price from going to zero, imo.

possibly ..

I'm not going to make any friends for saying this, but I do think this is wrong too.

But let me clarify that I don't @steemcleaners are running a scam and that they operate with the best of intentions, even if they make mistakes sometimes (we all do). I also disagree with your scornful attitude here but whatever and I want to say that I only support raising issues with respect. But your approach is your business.

I do agree with you that they should not be up voting their own comments. Doing a job like this is a public service here and there are other ways to get compensation for your efforts, such as the votes on reports and witness votes (which is how I operate).

What makes it worse is that @adm up votes all their comments too, which is an account they control and use. Each comment is about $1 total between the two votes. They are also self voting their reports with @steemcleaners and @adm, and their other supporting circle. None of the reports is as far back as I cared to look (20 or 30) were below $50 payout, with maybe above $100, even above $200.

I strongly disagree with this policy and think they should change it.

I don't mind if the admins upvote their own contents, after all, they are spending time doing this public service. But what is scary is if they start flagging posts and such in an unfair way just to get that extra money. :(

I agree, @SteemCleaners is out of control. I have been getting flagged for my original content just because I have referral links in my footer. While they are intending to put a stop to plagiarism, their witch-hunt for ref-links neeeds to end. It's a form of harassment in my opinion. When I wake up to see my post lost all of it's rewards due to a SteemCleaners flag I am instantly furious and flabbergasted. It makes me think STEEM itself needs to change the results of a flag/downvote action. It's not fair that they can down-vote a post, leave a copypasta comment, upvote themselves and then earn more money on their copypasta comment than the person who posted the original content. Something needs to change.

steemcleaners has to have bigger steem-power and also needs to negate some retaliation by spammers trying to decrease their reputation points.
And then, by doing so many downvotes, steemcleaners is already at a disadvantage, since it sacrifices its own voting quota not in order to grow itself, but to maintain some decency on this platform.
It also does what it does on less than 100% voting power, since it has so much work to do, so both its upvotes and its downvotes are reduced to some extent, which is another reason why it should be stronger.

Vote for yourself too.
The anti self vote is a bad witch hunt.
Far worse things happen here.
Buying votes is worse, and I did it too myself, because I found it to be too common.
Abuse of tags is worse than buying votes.
Plagiarism is even worse than abusing tags.
Spam and follow me-follow you, upvoted, upvote back are worse than buying votes too.

the irony. lol

Hi! Unfortunately upvoting yourself is required even for good actors, since bad actors doing it. Other than that, anything else wrong with them?

it is not required.. why is it required? they dont need to upvote to censor the steemit community

so does that mean the police can break the law to catch the bad guy who break the law? its the same thing..

corruption.. the account has been made specifically with a role in the steemit comunity and probably is unfairly supported by whales ho hold money and power .. all because of the part they are playing to aid spamming..

unfair advantage unfair and

the start of corruption just like the banking system ..

other than that is is a bit intrusive especially considering other people are actual spammers while I am involved in the community and actively in real in in communication with people..

Maybe I'm overacting a little

I meant following: Currently everyone upvotes themselves, otherwise they will slowly but gradually lose their influence and no one will stop upvoting. Why? If they will, bad guys will gradually overtake good guys and platform becomes bad for everyone. So, yes, do upvote yourself

upvoted and followed you if you like fitnessallinone please follow me

if you think that it is not in tune with cryptocurrencies transparency as a unregulated space then try and share..

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.19
JST 0.034
BTC 91364.38
ETH 3131.43
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.93