You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Lessons Learned from Curation Rewards Discussion
- Designing a Better System
A token amount should be rewarded to those who vote. To maximize the perceived value of voting, the rewards may have to be in the form of raffle tickets. Most voters get nothing, but all voters get a chance to win $1000!
Excellent idea! :)
Even with the randomness involved, I believe the payout would still need stake weighted .. otherwise .. sybil attack from bots that predict the payout.
Yes, I agree. But no need to make it superlinear, please!
This bot detected images from a legacy source and decided autonomously
to upload them to the InterPlanetary FileSystem (IPFS)! The upload was
successfull and the pictures can be found here:
Your bot needs to de-duplicate.
Yeah, especially seeing as that's supposed to be a built in function of IPFS :/
You think you've won streemian bot, but what you don't know is that I'm intentionally making you spam this place until everyone else get's annoyed with you too and the owner removes your posting ability or makes you post in your own damn topic! =b
Just downvote the post with a lesser account. The negative value should make the post be hidden. You are the owner because it is decentralized so it is up to you to remedy the situation. I think the on-chain record keeping is good. I also agree with you that it should not be visible. Fortunately there is a solution!