You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Join me in flagging @haejin - 46k in ABUSE REWARDS
@ranchorlaxo look like a noob whale but given how inactive he's been with his stake I think he deserve some patience and respect.
AFAIK this initiative is jumping the gun assuming bad faith or collusion.
I'm personally not a fan of technical analysis but no doubt people might believe in it given the insane global bull trend that's been happening in all alts.
IMO predicting 28$ SBD knowing the underlying fundamentals of the peg is irresponsible if not borderline criminal.
Like saying USDT will pump to 2.00 USD... No amount of technical analysis will make that sound remotely sane.
Looking a bit at this, I'm tentatively inclined to agree with you @transisto.
In looking at a sampling of @haejin's posts from about a week ago and earlier, what I see is this:
A prolific crypto analysis poster.
5300 followers... but only follows a few hundred (pretty normal for a content creator)
Average rewards in the $20-35 range.
Typically about 200-250 upvotes per post.
Typically about 10-20 comments per post.
Typically about 3000+ views per post.... whoa... hang on... 3000+ views???
Hardly ANYBODY on Steemit averages 3000 views per post.
Anyway, if we just leave that alone, it's the posting profile of a busy Steemian with a well-developed following. As a content creator, if each of my posts brought 3000 views here, I'd damn well hope I'd be getting $25-35 a post!
Has a web site; has a very active twitter with 9,500 followers. Posts all his Steemit posts to his twitter feed (external promotion of Steemit).
ONLY THING that has changed is the sudden 100% upvotes from an account with 1.3 million SP starting 3 days ago. An account that doesn't upvote a damn thing, otherwise. And has been largely dormant for months. That part is a bit suspect.
Other than that, we know very little. Aside from the fact that rancho's SP came from blocktrades. Most everything else is speculation.
Could we call this "rewards pool rape?" Sure. But maybe @haejin is merely a bystander who got some inadvertent good fortune at the hands of this "unknown" whale. My point: the damage is really being done by the person doing the VOTING, not by the recipient.
Now that make sense.
The truth is always in the data and not in opinion.
Well said Transisto first half. Well sorry but he's right so far about SBD. Seems the peg is flawed. Re USDT it's more likely to hit 0.5 that 2 but that's another story - ps how's does it feel to Be flagged Into grey by BS! Robots?
@transisto, we now have proof Haejin controls the Ranchorelaxo account.