Sort:  

Excellent question, but no. Discussion will continue to be rewarded in the usual manner, based on upvotes given by community members who see the merits of specific comments.. The proposal that was widely disliked in 0.8.1 to shift 25% of the rewards from each post to comments below that post. This would likely encourage spammy comments trying to capture a portion of rewards on high-paying posts, even if those comments are not good enough to earn their own votes.

Aha. So the author of the post would have been rewarded if there was heavy discussions under the post, even if there were no upvotes on the replies? I can see that being a problem, yes.

Not exactly. The author of the replies could be heavily rewarded even with basically no upvotes on the replies. So any post with a lot of upvotes on the post would become a magnet for junk replies trying to grab a piece of the prize.

I'd assume it means that the rewards for commenting remain unchanged, i.e.
25% for parent author(s)
25% for the comment author
50% for voters

The Discussion Rewards related to a proposal give a percent of the OP curation rewards to commenters. This would have been in addition to the Comment Rewards above, I think.

There was a proposal to remove the 25% that goes to parent author(s), although I'm not sure of the status of that. I'll take closer stock after this hard fork and after 4th July, as life is too short.

  • 0.5.x : 25% parent 25% author %50 voters 0% discussions
  • 0.8.1: 0% parent 50% author 25% voters 25% discussions
  • 0.8.2: 0% parent 75% author 25% voters
  • 0.8.3: 0% parent 75% author 25% voters

Great thanks for that.

there must be

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.14
JST 0.030
BTC 68021.51
ETH 3262.66
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.67