You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Maybe Steemit Inc Should Time Lock Their Steem

in #steem6 years ago (edited)

I'm sorry you're taking it this way. It's only a suggestion. If they accept fine everyone is better but if they don't, that's fine too. They are free to do what they wish for sure and I wouldn't want it otherwise.

Edit: My intentions are noble and because I respect you a lot, your comments and the comments from other people from SteemSpeak have made me reflect on the way I should go about trying to change things in the future. So I thank you for the comment as I think it helped me get better at what I'm trying to achieve. Sincerely. I stand behind the posts I wrote but I'll do things very differently from that point on. Thanks again!

Sort:  

Asking for witness vote decay is attacking Steemit Inc every day. Who's really paid here.

Why do you feel that asking for witness vote decay means "attacking Steemit" ? There are other people (including myself) who think that "witness vote decay" is an interesting feature that could potentially help the system: it would "stimulate" witnesses to not "sleep on their laurels" but rather go out and continuously engage with the community. Like in politics: if politicians were assured of your vote forever, they would make even less efforts than they make today, don't you think ?

Bizarre comment. Witness vote decay is something that Steemit Inc themselves have suggested in the past.

https://steemit.com/steem/@steemitblog/proposed-changes-to-steem-economy

If several persons misunderstood you, maybe, just maybe, you could have found a better way to express your thoughts? :-)

Then again, it could also be that we are all stupid, it happens! :-)

And believe me, I'm the first guy to deplore not having enough time to read more articles on Steemit!

Ah ok, now I see what you mean.

Questioning witness power != Attacking Steemit Inc

creo que no debe sugeri eso amigos

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.31
TRX 0.33
JST 0.055
BTC 98403.64
ETH 3845.09
SBD 4.18