You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: No On 21: Automatically vote against the hardfork
Theoretically it's possible that if we get @drakos into the top 20 some of the others who are on the fence will take that as a sign. He's close enough that's a reasonable hope.
Is @drakos solidly against HF21 and not upgrading in advance? Just set you as a proxy at least until the fork. I think this is a simple and elegant solution to making the no on 21 viewpoint heard. Scanning the list of witnesses I was disappointed to see some that had voiced opposition to much of 21 have still upgraded already. On the one hand, I think it’s simply professionalism and duty, but I think it’s also indicative of how most of these changes are made based on a cascading assumption of inevitability, that the forks are already foregone conclusions. I’d love to see this HF “broken” at the last moments to show the voting system to be alive and well, and force a rethink of how witness positions are communicated and then acted on by the community.
I have not been paying as much attention to this as I should be, so I'm not sure where Drakos is now, just that he's been one of the leading witnesses in opposition to the EIP previously.