You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Voting Abuse and Ineffective Curation: A proposal for blockchain-level change

in #steem7 years ago

I don't know if this will work overall but I am also willing to give it a try and since the platform is still in experimentation mode, where is the long-term harm? It can be rolled back or another option tried. The long-term harm of doing nothing is ultimate however.

As a content creator here, I personally stand behind my work and try to provide value for the curator by providing decent content for the platform. The vote bots are destroying the community aspect associated with these symbiotic relationships by being insensitive to the content it votes upon.

The curation teams out there lose revenue (compared to vote selling) and ability to pay their manual curators, as well as the pool being smaller due to the high votes on nothing content.

About a month ago I wrote a post about introducing a secondary slider for curators to shift more or less rewards their way up to the 50% mark. It is a closed post so will post it here in case anyone is interested as I think it is relevant to the discussion.

https://steemit.com/steemit/@tarazkp/curator-s-slider-steemit-development

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.16
JST 0.029
BTC 62589.43
ETH 2437.01
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.65