You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Did You Know: When you post using eSteem, 5% of rewards are disbursed to @esteemapp? Also, Self Voting Witnesses - a slippery slope, or a level playing field?
Yes that's good, but I would advocate something like a first time pop up on first vote unless it was really drawn attention to in the ToS.
It's just in the interest of full consent and understanding, not against the usage of beneficiaries, which I think is really great. Some of those I spoke to we're not happy about it not being clear so actually you have to repair that trust a little I think. It was not up front to add it without an in app message to being with.
If I may make a suggestion, maybe it need not explain this to me, and other users whose stake is higher than the benefit threshold, to set it to default false, but expose the option, even, a pesty first popover thing, begging me, as a big user, to help little users.
In my opinion, there needs to be a LOT more work, on the part of Steemit, Inc., towards actually providing some data, citations, and other useful justifications for things, instead of just selling it like the preambles on government law statutes. Just because the devs are optimistic their changes will do something positive, doesn't mean we should trust them, or even, simply take it without advisement.
You guys, who are building interfaces, you have a massive opportunity for getting intensive, direct, in-app feedback from users. This could really boost the UX for everyone, filtering out bad ideas sooner.
You mean first post, I think?
There's nothing wrong with beneficiaries, except for consent, in this case. When it is in favour of the user, consent is not so important, but I think leaving out a note about it is a bad thing also.
This is why trust has been lost, and rightly so.
Besides all thtis, standard interfaces have a tutorial at the beginning. One frame dedicated to this information seems reasonable (and there, you can put a checkbox!)